2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2014.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests for successive differences of quantiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in terms of the quantile function. Sankaran, Nair, and Sreedevi (2010) derived a test procedure for comparing various risks using sub-quantile functions and Soni, Dewan, and Jain (2015) proposed tests for successive comparison of quantiles using the quantile functions. Soni, Dewan, and Jain (2012) developed a non-parametric estimator of the quantile density function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in terms of the quantile function. Sankaran, Nair, and Sreedevi (2010) derived a test procedure for comparing various risks using sub-quantile functions and Soni, Dewan, and Jain (2015) proposed tests for successive comparison of quantiles using the quantile functions. Soni, Dewan, and Jain (2012) developed a non-parametric estimator of the quantile density function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analysis of data based 15 on quantile functions has been carried out in reliability and survival analysis and other branches of applied statistics (see, for example, [37], [44], [48], [30], [31], [39] and [41]). [46,47] have developed multiple comparison procedures for quantile functions. Nonparametric test procedures under competing risks have been developed by [34], [22] and [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such situations, comparison of mean has no relevance but comparing quantiles becomes important (Ref. Kotz and Seier 2009;Nair et al 2013;Soni et al 2015). There are situations where it is of interest to compare quantiles other than the median.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%