1959
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5151.532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests for Phenylketonuria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in urine. With phenylpyruvic acid the reagent strip changes to a green colour (Rupe and Free, 1958;Baird, 1958;Nellhaus, 1959;Gibbs and Woolf, 1959), whereas with P.A.S. it turns a pink or purple, according to the amount present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in urine. With phenylpyruvic acid the reagent strip changes to a green colour (Rupe and Free, 1958;Baird, 1958;Nellhaus, 1959;Gibbs and Woolf, 1959), whereas with P.A.S. it turns a pink or purple, according to the amount present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this " high-risk " group it is advisable not to rely only on detecting phenylpyruvic acid in the urine but to determine the concentration of phenylalanine in the blood at the ages Early detection by means of urine tests has presented certain special difficulties because of the occurrence of false-negative and false-positive results. Those who are planning programmes for routine testing of the urines of infants are recommended to study three papers (Gibbs and Woolf, 1959;Hudson and Ireland, 1959;Boyd, 1961) in which the production of fallacious results is described and advice given on methods of avoiding this.…”
Section: Phenylketonuriatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test is a sensitive and reliable method of detecting phenylpyruvic aciduria (Gibbs and Woolf, 1959;Woolf, 1963), which is an early sign of true phenylketonuria (Allen et al, 1964;Berry and Wright, 1967). Some practical difficulties have been emphasized by Hudson and Ireland (1959), but information is lacking on the effectiveness of the napkin test in mass detection programmes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%