1998
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.1998.10524759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests for Forecast Encompassing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
362
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 483 publications
(367 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
362
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Diebold-Mariano test is employed using the smallsample correction, as suggested by Harvey, Leybourne, and Newbold (1997). Furthermore, encompassing tests proposed by Harvey, Leybourne, and Newbold (1998) are carried out (Table 5). Eventually, the predictive accuracy can be improved by combining individual forecasting methods.…”
Section: Inflation Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Diebold-Mariano test is employed using the smallsample correction, as suggested by Harvey, Leybourne, and Newbold (1997). Furthermore, encompassing tests proposed by Harvey, Leybourne, and Newbold (1998) are carried out (Table 5). Eventually, the predictive accuracy can be improved by combining individual forecasting methods.…”
Section: Inflation Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that the two latter are necessary for 'good' forecast performance, but neither (nor both) is sufficient. See also Harvey et al (1998). 19 Note also that the fits of the two models -as measured by their respective residual standard errors -are close.…”
Section: Encompassing Rival Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical values are obtained using the Student's t distribution with P -1 degrees of freedom, where P is the length of the forecast evaluation period. e In columns (8) and (9), the outcome of the forecast encompassing test of Harvey, Leybourne and Newbold (1998) is reported. In column (8), we report the marginal significance levels (p-values) for the null hypotheses that the consensus forecasts encompass those of the ARDL model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%