2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests for cointegration allowing for an unknown number of breaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
352
0
291

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(675 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
352
0
291
Order By: Relevance
“…*** indicates the rejection of the null hypothesis at the 1% significance level. Maki (2012). The Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent (HAC) standard errors (Bartlett kernel, Newey-West fixed bandwidth = 4.0000) are in parentheses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…*** indicates the rejection of the null hypothesis at the 1% significance level. Maki (2012). The Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent (HAC) standard errors (Bartlett kernel, Newey-West fixed bandwidth = 4.0000) are in parentheses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, Maki (2012) offers four different models to analyze the cointegrating relationships between the variables. These models can be written as follows:…”
Section: Econometric Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of cointegration tests under multiple structural breaks are given in Table 2: It is seen that the null hypothesis of no cointegration can be rejected through the existence of various structural break years as can be seen in Table 2 and through two out of four models suggested by Maki (2012) as presented in the previous section of this study. Results from Maki (2012) reveal that equation (1) is a cointegration model and estimating the parameters in equation (2) would be robust in the long-term period. It is important to note that those break years which have been successfully obtained and provided in Table 2 are also added to estimate the long-term coefficients in equation (2) via dummy variables (Maki, 2012).…”
Section: Cointegration Tests Under Multiple Structural Breaksmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is due to the fact that series exhibit multiple breaks over the years as can also be obsereved in Figure 1. In the second step, cointegration tests (by Maki (2012)) which again considered multiple structural breaks untill five are carried out to confirm the existence of the cointegrating vector in equation (2). In the third step, long-run and short-run models plus ECT are estimated by using the Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation