Microencapsulation in the Food Industry 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-404568-2.00026-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Tools and Physical, Chemical, and Microbiological Characterization of Microencapsulated Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Effects of molar mass on aroma compounds and carriers on the retention of aroma compounds, the diffusion of aroma in the carrier (mainly polysaccharide, protein and lipid) is strongly influenced by its state. The diffusion coefficient of aroma compounds is known to decrease when the carrier materials changes from rubbery state to glass state ( Moran, Yi, Cadwallader & Padua, 2014 ).…”
Section: Molar Mass Effect On Mechanical Properties Of Gels and Solidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Effects of molar mass on aroma compounds and carriers on the retention of aroma compounds, the diffusion of aroma in the carrier (mainly polysaccharide, protein and lipid) is strongly influenced by its state. The diffusion coefficient of aroma compounds is known to decrease when the carrier materials changes from rubbery state to glass state ( Moran, Yi, Cadwallader & Padua, 2014 ).…”
Section: Molar Mass Effect On Mechanical Properties Of Gels and Solidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand systematically the aroma retention or release, it is logical to examine the influence of molar mass, chemical groups, polarity and volatility of aroma compounds retained in various carriers, glucose, maltose, maltodextrin, starch, thickening or gelling polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids. A general tendency that higher molar mass aroma compounds are better retained was recognized ( Moran, Yin, Cadwallader, & Padua, 2014 ). The relative retention was in the following order, ethyl propionate (MW = 102 g/mol) < ethyl butyrate (MW = 116) < isoamyl butyrate (MW = 158) < n-butyl pentanoate (MW = 158) in glucose, maltose (DE 50), maltodextrin (DE 41.4) and maltodextrin (DE 28.5) as a carrier of aroma compounds ( Goubet, Le Quere, & Voilley, 1998 ).…”
Section: Molar Mass Effect On Flavour Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%