1998
DOI: 10.1080/03610919808813509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the variance of skewed distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Type I error rates become more or less uncontrollable when either the alpha level gets small or the sample size is reduced. These results confirmed the recommendations of Lee and Sa (1998) that Zs is more suitable for moderate to large sample sizes and alpha levels not too small. Although Zs was specifically designed for the skewed distributions, it actually works reasonably well for the heavy-tailed distributions as long as the sample size and/or the alpha level are not too small.…”
Section: Type I Error Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the Type I error rates become more or less uncontrollable when either the alpha level gets small or the sample size is reduced. These results confirmed the recommendations of Lee and Sa (1998) that Zs is more suitable for moderate to large sample sizes and alpha levels not too small. Although Zs was specifically designed for the skewed distributions, it actually works reasonably well for the heavy-tailed distributions as long as the sample size and/or the alpha level are not too small.…”
Section: Type I Error Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Another alternative is presented in Kendall (1994) and Lee and Sa (1998). The robust chi-square statistic χ test with skewed distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another alternative is presented in Kendall (1994) and Lee and Sa (1998 Lee and Sa (1996) derived a new method for a right-tailed variance test of symmetric heavy-tailed distributions using an Edgeworth expansion (see Bickel & Doksum, 1977), and an inversion type of Edgeworth expansion provided by Hall (1983),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bootstrap requires extensive computer calculations and some programming ability by the practitioner making the method infeasible for some people. Although the jackknife method is easier to implement, it is a linear approximation to the bootstrap method and can give poor results when the statistic estimate is nonlinear.Another alternative is presented in Kendall (1994) and Lee and Sa (1998 where θˆ is any statistic, and θ , ) (θ σ where After a simulation study, their study found their test provided a "controlled Type I error rate as well as good power performance when sample size is moderate or large" (p. 51). Lee and Sa (1998) performed another study on a right-tailed test of variance for skewed distributions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%