1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02446240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the value of skeletal samples in demographic research: a comparison with vital registration samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of this fact, when the Bayesian approach (or "age length key") is applied to an anthropological or paleodemographic target sample, we will get an estimated age distribution which is neither a complete "mimic" of the reference sample nor completely independent of the reference. Given this fact, there is little reason to make empirical comparisons of reference and target age distributions (e.g., Van Gerven and Armelagos, 1983;Mensforth, 1990) or of estimated and real age distributions (Piontek and Weber, 1990;Lanphear, 1989). We know a priori (see Kimura, 1977;Westrheim and Ricker, 1978) that the estimated target age distribution will be biased in virtually all cases.…”
Section: Bias In the Traditional Methods Of Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence of this fact, when the Bayesian approach (or "age length key") is applied to an anthropological or paleodemographic target sample, we will get an estimated age distribution which is neither a complete "mimic" of the reference sample nor completely independent of the reference. Given this fact, there is little reason to make empirical comparisons of reference and target age distributions (e.g., Van Gerven and Armelagos, 1983;Mensforth, 1990) or of estimated and real age distributions (Piontek and Weber, 1990;Lanphear, 1989). We know a priori (see Kimura, 1977;Westrheim and Ricker, 1978) that the estimated target age distribution will be biased in virtually all cases.…”
Section: Bias In the Traditional Methods Of Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second problem has been discussed by Weiss (1973:12-13) for living and skeletal populations and by Walker et al (1988) in the paleodemographic setting. The third problem of unknown ages has seen heated debate in the paleodemographic literature (Bocquet-Appel andMasset, 1982, 1985;Van Gerven and Armelagos, 1983;Bocquet-Appel, 1986;Greene et al, 1986;Lanphear, 1989;Piontek and Weber, 1990), and serves as the basis for this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of 81 subadults (aged 19 years or less), 125 adult males, 74 adult females, and 16 skeletons of unknown age or sex. More information on the demographic make-up of the Monroe County Poorhouse mortality sample is given by Lanphear (1989). Two of the skeletons were identified as those of African Americans; the remainder were identified as white.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researchers argued that the target age-at-death distribution was heavily influenced by the age-at-death distribution from the reference sample. Although Bocquet-Appel and Masset stated that this problem, along with aging bias and low correlation between age indicators and chronological age could not be overcome, several researchers (10,(14)(15)(16)64,68,73,77,(79)(80)(81)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94)(95)(96)(97)(98) have provided adequate and ample solutions to the problems reported by Bocquet-Appel and Masset. Using appropriate reference samples and statistical methodologies, as addressed below, can eliminate age mimicry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%