2021
DOI: 10.3390/ai2010004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Suitability of Automated Machine Learning for Weeds Identification

Abstract: In the past years, several machine-learning-based techniques have arisen for providing effective crop protection. For instance, deep neural networks have been used to identify different types of weeds under different real-world conditions. However, these techniques usually require extensive involvement of experts working iteratively in the development of the most suitable machine learning system. To support this task and save resources, a new technique called Automated Machine Learning has started being studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since both datasets in this study were multi-class problems with a class imbalance, in comparison, we calculated the micro-averaging F1 grade, which is a preferable aggregation method over the macro-average. To conduct statistical comparisons, we used robust, paired non-parametric statistical tests: the Li test [17] and the Espejo signed-rank test [1]. These tests were employed to prevent drawing too optimistic conclusions.…”
Section: F Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both datasets in this study were multi-class problems with a class imbalance, in comparison, we calculated the micro-averaging F1 grade, which is a preferable aggregation method over the macro-average. To conduct statistical comparisons, we used robust, paired non-parametric statistical tests: the Li test [17] and the Espejo signed-rank test [1]. These tests were employed to prevent drawing too optimistic conclusions.…”
Section: F Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning workflows or workflow sub-modules are often automated, i.e. automated classification [35], Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) in healthcare [36], aviation [37,38], biology [39] and agriculture [40,41].…”
Section: Of 36mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kang et al [50] produced a unique neural network to classify butterflies based on the shape of their wings, with an accuracy of 80.3%. Bouzalmat et al [51] used PCA and SVM to analyze two feature collections, the ATT and IFD datasets, which achieved 90.24 % and 66.8% accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%