2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01421.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the spatial phylogenetic structure of local communities: statistical performances of different null models and test statistics on a locally neutral community

Abstract: Summary 1.Analyzing the phylogenetic structure of natural communities may illuminate the processes governing the assembly and coexistence of species. For instance, an association between species cooccurrence in local communities and their phylogenetic proximity may reveal the action of habitat filtering, niche conservatism and/or competitive exclusion. 2. Different methods were recently proposed to test such community-wide phylogenetic patterns, based on the phylogenetic clustering or overdispersion of the spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
376
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(392 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
376
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…r-project.org) and Vegan v2.0-2 Finally, we inferred the underlying processes following the three steps listed in the Introduction section. For instance, the variation in the magnitude of ses.betaMNTD should be driven primarily by variation in the influence of deterministic processes as deviations from the betaMNTD null model expectation are primarily due to niche-based processes (Hardy, 2008). Significant increases in ses.betaMNTD with increasing environmental distances therefore implies that the influence of niche-based processes grows with increasingly large shifts in measured environmental conditions (Fine and Kembel, 2011;Stegen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…r-project.org) and Vegan v2.0-2 Finally, we inferred the underlying processes following the three steps listed in the Introduction section. For instance, the variation in the magnitude of ses.betaMNTD should be driven primarily by variation in the influence of deterministic processes as deviations from the betaMNTD null model expectation are primarily due to niche-based processes (Hardy, 2008). Significant increases in ses.betaMNTD with increasing environmental distances therefore implies that the influence of niche-based processes grows with increasingly large shifts in measured environmental conditions (Fine and Kembel, 2011;Stegen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the partial Mantel coefficient related to spatial distance should reflect deterministic processes governed by unmeasured environmental variables. The reason is twofold: (i) the influence of measured environmental variables has already been accounted for because we are dealing with partial Mantel coefficients; and (ii) the magnitude of phylogenetic null model departures (that is, ses.betaMNTD) should only be influenced by deterministic processes; stochastic processes should have no influence (Hardy, 2008).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Signal Varies With Phylogenetic Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this model, the tips (individual taxa) are shuffled throughout the phylogeny and the resulting metrics were compared with the observed value with a ¼ 0.05. The tip shuffling model was determined to be robust for Phylocom analysis with a low level of Type I error (false positives; Hardy, 2008). We used the net relatedness index (NRI) metric to compare phylogenetic clustering of microbial communities across the distinct gut regions.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Community Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%