2017
DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1332018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the scoping phase of a bottom-up planning guide designed to support Australian Indigenous rangers manage the impacts of climate change on cultural heritage sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fatorić and Seekamp [28] identified 16 barriers to adaptation of cultural heritage to climate change in the Southeast of the US, which they grouped into three main categories: institutional barriers (e.g., lack of political commitment), technical barriers (e.g., lack of technical expertise), and financial barriers (e.g., lack of funding). The barriers to adaptation identified by Carmichael et al [29] at cultural heritage sites in Australia were related to governance and compatibility with current management frameworks. Casey [30] identified two categories of barriers to adapt cultural heritage sites in three US National Parks to climate change: institutional barriers, which result from existing structures and frameworks, and conceptual barriers, such as problems in prioritizing the cultural resources to be preserved and adapted, together with challenges in managing those resources.…”
Section: Adapting Cultural Heritage To Climate Change Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fatorić and Seekamp [28] identified 16 barriers to adaptation of cultural heritage to climate change in the Southeast of the US, which they grouped into three main categories: institutional barriers (e.g., lack of political commitment), technical barriers (e.g., lack of technical expertise), and financial barriers (e.g., lack of funding). The barriers to adaptation identified by Carmichael et al [29] at cultural heritage sites in Australia were related to governance and compatibility with current management frameworks. Casey [30] identified two categories of barriers to adapt cultural heritage sites in three US National Parks to climate change: institutional barriers, which result from existing structures and frameworks, and conceptual barriers, such as problems in prioritizing the cultural resources to be preserved and adapted, together with challenges in managing those resources.…”
Section: Adapting Cultural Heritage To Climate Change Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, less research has been conducted on the identification of the barriers to adapting our cultural heritage to climate change [27][28][29][30] and in considering geological hazards in the assessment of vulnerability to inform the adaptation process. Phillips [27] investigated whether climate change is considered in the management plans of WHS in the United Kingdom (UK) and identified issues arising from its consideration, notably the lack of detailed information from climate change scenarios and the uncertainty associated with them, as well as the lack of resources, knowledge, and skills available.…”
Section: Adapting Cultural Heritage To Climate Change Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the articles that report on groundwork adaptation actions, the most common focus is on documenting stakeholder perspectives on climate change and their attitudes towards adaptation (35%, n = 135). Some of these articles seek to understand stakeholders' views on climate change, risk and adaptation [25], while others explore mechanisms to more effectively engage community members in climate change adaptation planning and implementation [26]. Other studies aim to understand how adaptation is influenced by stakeholder perspectives on climate change, current socio-economic situations, attitudes towards change, and engagement in decision-making [27].…”
Section: Adaptation Initiatives Primarily Focus On Groundwork Adaptatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these articles seek to understand stakeholders' views on climate change, risk and adaptation (e.g Ambrey et al 2017),. while others explore mechanisms to more effectively engage community members in climate change adaptation planning and implementation (e.g Carmichael et al 2017)Elrick-Barr et al 2015)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%