2007
DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.

Abstract: The present study took a critical look at a central construct in couples research: relationship satisfaction. Eight well-validated self-report measures of relationship satisfaction, including the Marital Adjustment Test (MAT; H. J. Locke & K. M. Wallace, 1959), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS; G. B. Spanier, 1976), and an additional 75 potential satisfaction items, were given to 5,315 online participants. Using item response theory, the authors demonstrated that the MAT and DAS provided relatively poor levels… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

46
1,478
9
23

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,384 publications
(1,561 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
46
1,478
9
23
Order By: Relevance
“…The dissatisfaction cut off score is 104.5. This implies that those whose scores were below 104.5 are dissatisfied in their marital relationship while those whose scores were higher than 104.5 are satisfied in their marital relationship [5].…”
Section: E Research Tools and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dissatisfaction cut off score is 104.5. This implies that those whose scores were below 104.5 are dissatisfied in their marital relationship while those whose scores were higher than 104.5 are satisfied in their marital relationship [5].…”
Section: E Research Tools and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, marital satisfaction will be determined through a self report scale called the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-32) developed by Janette L. Funk and Ronald D. Rogge. CSI-32 is believed to be more precise, more accurate and is able to provide greater amounts of information as compared to other existing measures of marital satisfaction [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several questionnaire scales have previously been developed in this field, including the Quality Marriage Index (7), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (8), the Marital Satisfaction Inventory (9), the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (10), the Marital Satisfaction and Commitment Scales (11), the Commitment Inventory (12), the Relationship Assessment Scale (13), the Marital Satisfaction Scale (14), the Couples Satisfaction Index (15) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples (16). Such scales represent important contributions to measurement in this field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the unique issues that international couples face, this study was conducted to understand whether or not there are differences in marital values and satisfaction between domestic and international couples. Marriage satisfaction has become a central construct, which serves as a cornerstone for understanding how marriages work (Funk & Rogge, 2007); therefore, measures of satisfaction were deemed a reasonable starting point for examining this population.…”
Section: The Satisfaction and Values Of Domestic And International Mamentioning
confidence: 99%