Cross-national surveys are increasingly being set up or used in analyses, and so are cross-cultural surveys in general, including those conducted in different ethnic groups within a single country (Smith 2010; Van de Vijver 2013). It is therefore more pressing than ever to have a sound methodology at one's disposal that allows a researcher to produce equivalent data that can be meaningfully compared across countries and cultures. After all, equivalence is the prerequisite for any sound conclusions. In the words of Johnson (1998, p. 30): "In addition to the traditional reliability and validity requirements for monocultural survey instruments, researchers conducting cross-cultural survey research have the added concern of equivalence. Indeed, cross-cultural research demands a commitment to the establishment of equivalence that is at least equal to the attention routinely reserved for the problems of reliability and validity." From a quantitative perspective and for multiple-item scales, equivalence is often discussed within a three-level framework that distinguishes between configural, metric