2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the persistence of Carcharodontosauridae (Theropoda) in the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia based on dental evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2020; Meso et al . 2021), which had been advocated only on the basis of isolated teeth (Martinelli & Forasiepi 2004; Veralli & Calvo 2004; Candeiro et al . 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2020; Meso et al . 2021), which had been advocated only on the basis of isolated teeth (Martinelli & Forasiepi 2004; Veralli & Calvo 2004; Candeiro et al . 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding to the dental synapomorphies recovered for Abelisauridae, these are numerous and highly diagnostic [17,22,36,37,39,40]. The case of Morphotype 4 is intriguing, as despite not demonstrating a robust a nity with a speci c subclade, it can be tentatively classi ed as an alvarezsaurid rather than an unenlaginae (see below).…”
Section: Cladistics and Multivariate Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This great dataset includes eleven measurements (i.e., CBL, CBW, CH, AL, MCL, MCW, MCR, MSL, LAF, LIF, MDL, DDL), taken in 1374 teeth belonging to 91 taxa (86 species and ve indeterminate family-based taxa) separated into 20 monophyletic or paraphyletic groups [17,36]. As in previous studies (e.g., [17,37]), a second analysis was performed on a dataset restricted to rst-hand measurements by [22], since most researchers measure theropod crowns differently (see [22], for further information on this tendency). Considering that various teeth belong to relatively large-sized animals, a third analysis was carried out on a dataset restricted to theropod taxa with crowns of more than 20 mm.…”
Section: Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This great dataset includes eleven measurements (i.e., CBL, CBW, CH, AL, MCL, MCW, MCR, MSL, LAF, LIF, MDL, DDL), taken in 1374 teeth belonging to 91 taxa (86 species and five indeterminate family-based taxa) separated into 20 monophyletic or paraphyletic groups [19,38]. As in previous studies (e.g., [19,39]), a second analysis was performed on a dataset restricted to first-hand measurements by [24], since most researchers measure theropod crowns differently (see [24], for further information on this tendency). Considering that various teeth belong to relatively large-sized animals, a third analysis was carried out on a dataset restricted to theropod taxa with crowns of more than 20 mm.…”
Section: Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%