2013
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2012.733923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the modified Rothamsted Carbon Model for paddy soils against the results from long-term experiments in southern China

Abstract: We compared predictions of the modified Rothamsted Carbon Model (RothC) for paddy soils (RothC-26.3_p), with decomposition rate constants set at 0.2 and 0.6 times the values in the original RothC-26.3 for submerged and drained periods, respectively, with the results of five long-term field studies in southern China. These field studies included two paddy-upland rotation sites (Chongqing and Wuchang) and three double rice cropping sites (Wangcheng, Nanchang, and Jinxian). Several treatments (no fertilizer, inor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the long-term data sets to validate the accuracy of the Rothamsted carbon (RothC) model (Coleman & Jenkinson, 1999) on the subset of field trial sites (n = 10), since this type of experiments had not been done here previously (Jiang et al, 2013(Jiang et al, , 2014; Figure S3). We then used climate change model scenarios as input weather files to the RothC model to enable future SOC predictions based on climate change (Jiang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Soil Carbon Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the long-term data sets to validate the accuracy of the Rothamsted carbon (RothC) model (Coleman & Jenkinson, 1999) on the subset of field trial sites (n = 10), since this type of experiments had not been done here previously (Jiang et al, 2013(Jiang et al, , 2014; Figure S3). We then used climate change model scenarios as input weather files to the RothC model to enable future SOC predictions based on climate change (Jiang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Soil Carbon Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y g and Y s are the rice grain and straw yields (kg ha −1 ), respectively. Thirty percent is the relative ratio of root biomass to grain and straw biomass of rice (Liang et al., 2019), 5.6% is the relative ratio of stubble biomass to grain and straw biomass of rice (Jiang et al., 2013), 14% is the average moisture content of air‐dried plant samples, and 0.418 is the proportion of organic C content of dried biomass for rice. C manure , W , and A are the organic C content (52 g kg −1 ), water content (88%), and fresh base weight (kg ha −1 ) of manure, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictions of the modified version of the RothC for paddy soils (RothC-26.3_p), with decomposition rate constants set at 0.2 and 0.6 times smaller than the original RothC-26.3 for submerged and drained periods, respectively, were compared with the observed results of five long-term field studies in southern China (Jiang et al 2013). These field studies included two paddy-upland rotation sites (Chongqing and Wuchang) and three double rice cropping sites (Wangcheng, Nanchang, and Jinxian).…”
Section: Validation Of the Rothc In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%