2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2004.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the k–Sb relationship at the microscale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bubble size in flotation was measured using the photographic method (Chen et al, 2001;Hernandez-Aguilar et al, 2005). A CCD camera was used to capture images of bubbles in a viewing chamber as they rose from the pulp zone through a tube.…”
Section: Bubble Size Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bubble size in flotation was measured using the photographic method (Chen et al, 2001;Hernandez-Aguilar et al, 2005). A CCD camera was used to capture images of bubbles in a viewing chamber as they rose from the pulp zone through a tube.…”
Section: Bubble Size Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 15b shows that at a low S b value of 24.08 s −1 , the flotation rate constant obtained was 1.6 min −1 , and it decreased significantly with the increase in the value of S b . Even though the lowest flotation rate constant was observed for a 4 L/min aeration rate, it steeply increased with the increase in the S b value, as suggested by [14,25,26]. In addition, it is clearly shown that the maximum rate constant of 2.17 min −1 was observed at a maximum S b value 101.58 s −1 for a higher aeration rate.…”
Section: Effect Of the Bubble Surface Area Flux On The Copper Rate Comentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The difference between the two may be that actual flotation, as in Figure 2, works with bubble and particle size distributions that hide the relationships apparent when idealized systems are tested. Hernandez-Aguilar et al [92] measured k-S b on micro-scale with bubble size distributions and found that a linear k-S b (i.e., k-(d b ) −1 ) was adequate but cautioned that the data, even though collected using closely controlled conditions, could be fitted to other d b functions as well.…”
Section: Bubble-particle Attachmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%