1995
DOI: 10.1121/1.412450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the importance of talker variability in non-native speech contrast training

Abstract: In contrast to Japanese adults trained with stimuli produced by five talkers,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that in the literature on adult second language learning, high variability training approaches have been widely found to be most effective in helping adults acquire non-native phonetic categories and generalize to stimuli outside the training set (see Bradlow, 2008 for a review). Yet in some cases, training with an appropriate individual talker is as effective as multiple-talker training in promoting stimulus-general learning and allows transfer to a novel talker (Magnuson, Yamada, Tohkura, & Bradlow, 1995). The notion of exemplar-type generalization is consistent with such data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that in the literature on adult second language learning, high variability training approaches have been widely found to be most effective in helping adults acquire non-native phonetic categories and generalize to stimuli outside the training set (see Bradlow, 2008 for a review). Yet in some cases, training with an appropriate individual talker is as effective as multiple-talker training in promoting stimulus-general learning and allows transfer to a novel talker (Magnuson, Yamada, Tohkura, & Bradlow, 1995). The notion of exemplar-type generalization is consistent with such data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key elements of this training approach that are apparently responsible for the robust learning are the stimuli (i.e., a wide range ofIrl and III exemplars produced by multiple talkers) and the task (i.e., a minimal-pair identification task that encourages classification into broad phonetic categories rather than a discrimination task that encourages perception of finegrained within-category differences). While the unique impact of the high-variability approach to perceptual learning has been established experimentally (Lively et al, 1993;Magnuson et al, 1995), it is still an open question whether the high-variability approach is more effective in promoting long-term improvement in production than other, "low-variability" approaches. The major strength of the high-variability training approach for perceptual learning is that it produces highly generalized learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, several important advances have been made toward establishing effective laboratory training procedures for modifying the identification of difficult non-native phonetic categories (for recent reviews, see Akahane-Yamada, 1996;Jamieson, 1995;Logan & Pruitt, 1995;Pisoni & Lively, 1995;Pisoni, Lively,& Logan, 1994). In addition to the benefits that such speech sound training procedures present for second-language learners, this general research agenda also provides important new information regarding the extent to which the adult phonetic system is plastic and thus capable of undergoing linguistically meaningful modifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely, however, that the use of a single talker lead the learner to assume that all aspects of the talker’s speech were general to the language at hand. Previous studies have shown that generalization to novel talkers increases with the number of talkers heard during training (Magnuson, et al, 1995). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no studies have focused on categorical phonological patterns like vowel harmony, research has tested learners’ ability to generalize to novel talkers when learning a novel phonetic contrast, such as the difference between /l/ and /r/ that is present in English but not Japanese. Japanese learners of English were able to extend the novel phonetic category to novel talkers only when participants were trained on stimuli that included multiple talkers (Lively, Pisoni, & Logan, 1992; Logan, et al, 1991; Magnuson et al, 1995). This suggests that phonetic contrasts may be formed via talker-specific representations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%