1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1981.tb00348.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Impact of Recalls on the Demand for Automobiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harrison et al (1982) also show that 74 percent of owners who experienced automobile recalls are favorable to the purchase of the same model. In contrast, Crafton et al (1981) demonstrate that automobile recalls for safety reasons have a short-term negative influence on sales of these products. Jarrell and Peltzman (1985) show that recalls may have an impact on the stock market of the company in question.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature And Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Harrison et al (1982) also show that 74 percent of owners who experienced automobile recalls are favorable to the purchase of the same model. In contrast, Crafton et al (1981) demonstrate that automobile recalls for safety reasons have a short-term negative influence on sales of these products. Jarrell and Peltzman (1985) show that recalls may have an impact on the stock market of the company in question.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature And Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The model, known as a paired-difference design, is a special case of the general randomized block design (Mendenhall and Reinmuth, 1974). Crafton et al (1981) (Reilly and Hoffer, 1983) developed a paired-difference model to assess the impact of recalls on the demand for automobiles. The same basic design is used in the current study to examine the impact of styling change on the demand for automobiles.…”
Section: T H E Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The reference is to Bragdon and Marlin (1972), Spicer (1978), Levy and Shatto (1980), Maddox and Siegfried (1980), Crafton et al (1981), Fry et al (1982), Reilly and Hoffer (1983), Shane and Spicer (1983), Stevens (1984), Jarrell and Peltzman (1985), Newgren et al (1985), Marcus and Goodman (1986), Pruitt and Peterson (1986), Wokutch and Spencer (1987), Hoffer et al (1988), Bromiley and Marcus (1989), Morris et al (1990), Davidson and Worrell (1992), Porter and Van Der Linde (1995), McLaughlin (1996), Nehrt (1996), Galaskiewicz (1997), Judge and Douglas (1998), Klassen and Whybark (1999), Dowell et al (2000), Gompers et al (2003), Brown and Caylor (2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%