2011
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2011)005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the gaugino AMSB model at the Tevatron via slepton pair production

Abstract: Gaugino AMSB models-wherein scalar and trilinear soft SUSY breaking terms are suppressed at the GUT scale while gaugino masses adopt the AMSB form-yield a characteristic SUSY particle mass spectrum with light sleptons along with a nearly degenerate wino-like lightest neutralino and quasi-stable chargino. The left-sleptons and sneutrinos can be pair produced at sufficiently high rates to yield observable signals at the Fermilab Tevatron. We calculate the rate for isolated single and dilepton plus missing energy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenomenology is clearly quite sensitive to the model parameters (fluxes choices). This is quite unlike the case of LVS models where with a few general assumptions about the location of the MSSM a viable phenomenology is obtained [6][7] [8][9] [10]. While the original motivation for this investigation was in fact to remove the requirement on the location on the MSSM cycle, that is needed in the LVS case, to satisfy FCNC constraints, the upshot of our investigation actually strengthens the case for this scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The phenomenology is clearly quite sensitive to the model parameters (fluxes choices). This is quite unlike the case of LVS models where with a few general assumptions about the location of the MSSM a viable phenomenology is obtained [6][7] [8][9] [10]. While the original motivation for this investigation was in fact to remove the requirement on the location on the MSSM cycle, that is needed in the LVS case, to satisfy FCNC constraints, the upshot of our investigation actually strengthens the case for this scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…( 14) into eqn. (10) with F S = F U = 0, we compute the scalar potential for this model and expand in negative powers of the volume. For large volumes the potential can be safely approximated by…”
Section: Analytic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations