2004
DOI: 10.1002/sim.1949
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the equality of two Poisson means using the rate ratio

Abstract: In this article, we investigate procedures for comparing two independent Poisson variates that are observed over unequal sampling frames (i.e. time intervals, populations, areas or any combination thereof). We consider two statistics (with and without the logarithmic transformation) for testing the equality of two Poisson rates. Two methods for implementing these statistics are reviewed. They are (1) the sample-based method, and (2) the constrained maximum likelihood estimation (CMLE) method. We conduct an emp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming a cardiovascular event rate of 1260 events per 100 000 person-years (all ages) in the control arm, 6 and a 10% lower event rate in the intervention arm (rate ratio of intervention to control of 0.9), a total sample of about 70 000 patients followed up for 2 years gives 80% power for a test at level 5% (twosided) allowing for 15% withdrawal. 7 This calculation was based on all-age event rates as it was not possible to find an event rate specifically for the over 50s at the time the trial was designed. The intervention was applied to the over 50s population and the outcome was measured in this age group only.…”
Section: Outcomes and Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a cardiovascular event rate of 1260 events per 100 000 person-years (all ages) in the control arm, 6 and a 10% lower event rate in the intervention arm (rate ratio of intervention to control of 0.9), a total sample of about 70 000 patients followed up for 2 years gives 80% power for a test at level 5% (twosided) allowing for 15% withdrawal. 7 This calculation was based on all-age event rates as it was not possible to find an event rate specifically for the over 50s at the time the trial was designed. The intervention was applied to the over 50s population and the outcome was measured in this age group only.…”
Section: Outcomes and Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following procedures from the studies [24][25][26] for comparing two independent Poisson rates with unequal sample frames, we derived the Wald's inference procedures using the properties of ˆi γ and φ estimated from MLE and ˆi γ and φ from CMLE with a negative binomial distribution in two conditions ( )…”
Section: Wald Statistical Test and Log-transformed Wald Statistical Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logarithmic transformation is usually adopted for skewness correction and variance stabilization as suggested by these studies [16,24]. The statistical inference on the quantity is ( )…”
Section: Wald Statistical Test and Log-transformed Wald Statistical Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling we discuss here includes the now popular rate sampling, cf. Thode (1997) and Ng and Tang (2005) for Poisson distribution and Moser et al (1989), and Sprott and Farewell (1993) for the normal distribution, among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in Gaussian case, we have Sichel (1973), Thode (1997), Krishnamoorthy and Thomsons (2004), and Ng and Tang (2005). Rate sampling in the normal case with homogenous variance is known as the regression through the origin case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%