1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00435732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire on cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses

Abstract: This study aimed to contribute to the validation of the 30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group (EORTC QLQ-C30). The sample consisted of 177 cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses. A series of scales representing various dimensions of quality of life were tested, including those proposed by the EORTC Study Group. Mokken's non-parametric latent trait model for unidimensional scaling was used as the basic scaling procedur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
2
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
86
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…If so, the associations with optimism would have been uniform. This divergence in prediction also attests once again to the importance of distinguishing among the various facets of QOL (Avis et al, 2005;Cella et al, 1993;Osoba et al, 1997;Ringdal and Ringdal, 1993;Schag and Heinrich, 1990;Schag et al, 1991;Schipper et al, 1984).…”
Section: Long-term Cancer Survivorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If so, the associations with optimism would have been uniform. This divergence in prediction also attests once again to the importance of distinguishing among the various facets of QOL (Avis et al, 2005;Cella et al, 1993;Osoba et al, 1997;Ringdal and Ringdal, 1993;Schag and Heinrich, 1990;Schag et al, 1991;Schipper et al, 1984).…”
Section: Long-term Cancer Survivorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Deciding how to measure QOL is not as easy as it might seem. After a period when QOL was viewed almost entirely in functional terms, several multiscale inventories were developed to assess QOL after treatment (Borghede and Sullivan, 1996;Cella et al, 1993;Osoba et al, 1997;Ringdal and Ringdal, 1993;Schag et al, 1991;Schag and Heinrich, 1990;Schipper et al, 1984). A key principle behind those measures is that QOL is manifest in diverse ways, all of which may matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two its external validity has been checked in several hundreds hundred and fifty-four patients were randomized to ABMT of patients with lung cancer, 14 and various types of canor second ICC, which were completed in 95 and 104 cer. 15 Its psychometric properties have been also evaluated patients, respectively. Eighteen centers agreed to participate in 125 adults surviving several years after BMT, 16 with a in the QOL study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a multidimensional, cancer-specific, and self-administered instrument, 15 cross-culturally tested for reliability and validity. 7,[15][16][17] The instrument consists of 30 items divided into three major domains: functional scales, global health/quality of life (QoL) scale and symptom scales. Functional scales consist of physical (five items), role (two items), emotional (four items), social (two items) and cognitive (two items) items.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%