2006
DOI: 10.3375/0885-8608(2006)26[17:tteosr]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Efficacy of Species Richness and Floristic Quality Assessment of Quality, Temporal Change, and Fire Effects in Tallgrass Prairie Natural Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The declines in Mean C and FQI observed in the chronosequence of this study were consistent with studies of prairie restorations (Sluis ; Camill et al. ; McLachlan & Knispel ) and remnants (Bowles & Jones ). Nevertheless, our study suggests higher values of Mean C and especially FQI among the younger restoration sites relative to the older restoration sites may indicate that prairie restoration characterized by high floristic quality is possible in the early stages of restoration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The declines in Mean C and FQI observed in the chronosequence of this study were consistent with studies of prairie restorations (Sluis ; Camill et al. ; McLachlan & Knispel ) and remnants (Bowles & Jones ). Nevertheless, our study suggests higher values of Mean C and especially FQI among the younger restoration sites relative to the older restoration sites may indicate that prairie restoration characterized by high floristic quality is possible in the early stages of restoration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…; McNicoll & Augspurger ; Sivicek & Taft ; Spyreas et al. ), despite the subjective nature of assigning C values to species and a potential bias towards rare species (Bowles & Jones ; Landi & Chiarucci ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been developed for over 12 states and provinces, most recently South Florida (2009), Minnesota wetlands (2010), the flora of the Northeastern US (2010) and coastal Louisiana (2011). Although a few studies (e.g., [24,25]) have found limitations in the effectiveness of C-values to reflect habitat quality based on other measures, C-values have been independently confirmed to reflect habitat quality and integrity and degree of anthropogenic habitat disturbance in other studies. Plant communities for which C-values have proved efficacious include tallgrass prairie (e.g., [26,27]) and wetlands (e.g., [28][29][30][31]).…”
Section: -10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grade A prairies had higher total richness (F = 4.91, P = 0.029) and higher plot species richness (F = 12.0, P < 0.001) than Orade B prairies. This indicates that species richness can be an important factor in ranking vegetation qua lity (Bowles and Jones 2006). Most species were rare at the landscape level, with 33% occurring in single communities and 70% found in less than five communities (Figure 4) .…”
Section: Species Distribution Species Richness and Spatial Abundancementioning
confidence: 97%