2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01441.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Effects of Social Norms and Behavioral Privacy on Hand Washing: A Field Experiment

Abstract: The social norms approach is often used for the development of messages designed to modify perceived norms and associated behaviors in a variety of domains. In the main, this literature consists of large-scale campaigns or message-testing experiments in which researchers manipulate the normative information presented to message recipients and assess the impact of this information on subsequent attitudes and behaviors. Wechsler, Seibring, Liu, and Ahl (2004) reported that social norms campaigns had been adopted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lapinski and Rimal (2005) state that if the act or outcomes of enacting a behavior are not publicly known, then injunctive norms will likely not influence behavior. Further, Lapinski and colleagues (2013) contend that an interaction between norms and behavioral privacy may only be present when the behavior in question is socially undesirable. Indoor tanning is largely a private behavior, and one that can be perceived as a source of shame (Hunt, Auguston, Rutten, Moser, & Yaroch, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lapinski and Rimal (2005) state that if the act or outcomes of enacting a behavior are not publicly known, then injunctive norms will likely not influence behavior. Further, Lapinski and colleagues (2013) contend that an interaction between norms and behavioral privacy may only be present when the behavior in question is socially undesirable. Indoor tanning is largely a private behavior, and one that can be perceived as a source of shame (Hunt, Auguston, Rutten, Moser, & Yaroch, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DN were elicited by asking respondents three questions about their perceptions of the proportion of key groups living in the United States (friends, family members, and other Asians) having ever had HBV screening (Lapinski, Maloney, Braz, & Shulman, 2013; Rimal & Real, 2005). Response categories ranged from none (1) to all (7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IN focused on respondents’ perceptions about support for HBV screening, specifically by asking whether participants believed other persons (family members, close friends, most people that they know, and their physician) approved of having HBV screening (Lapinski et al, 2013; Rimal & Real, 2005) ( n = 4, α = 0.94). A 7-point Likert scale was used, ranging from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the majority of SNT research has concentrated on alcohol consumption (e.g., Perkins, 2007), handwashing in students has recently been the focus of a small number of studies (e.g., Lapinski, Maloney, Braz and Shulman, 2013;Miko et al, 2013). Mackert, Liang and Champlin (2013) found that students reported that they washed their hands after using the bathroom 88% of the time but estimated that their peers only washed theirs 58.6% of the time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%