2004
DOI: 10.1086/381493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Cosmic Microwave Background Data for Systematic Effects

Abstract: Under the assumption that the concordance à cold dark matter (CDM) model is the correct model, we test the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data for systematic effects by examining the bandpass temperature residuals with respect to this model. Residuals are analyzed as a function of angular scale l, Galactic latitude, frequency, calibration source, instrument type, and several other variables that may be associated with potential systematic effects. Our main result is that we find no significant sy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different instruments have different potential systematic problems and they cover a wide range of frequencies. The agreement therefore indicates that none of the experiments is seriously contaminated by foreground emission or other systematic effects (see also Griffiths & Lineweaver 2004). From the analysis of the peak structure (Section 5.3), there is extremely good agreement on the peak structure between experiments, except for a slight discrepancy in the amplitude of the third peak, which may have important consequences for the cosmological models.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The different instruments have different potential systematic problems and they cover a wide range of frequencies. The agreement therefore indicates that none of the experiments is seriously contaminated by foreground emission or other systematic effects (see also Griffiths & Lineweaver 2004). From the analysis of the peak structure (Section 5.3), there is extremely good agreement on the peak structure between experiments, except for a slight discrepancy in the amplitude of the third peak, which may have important consequences for the cosmological models.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It is therefore critical to ensure that these contaminants can be controlled to a level that does not jeopardize the science goals of the mission. The impact of systematic effects plays a central role in the analysis of modern CMB experiments [2-4, 27, 44, 47] and is the main subject of several papers as well (e.g., [16,20,32,45]), many of them focusing specifically on polarization specific systematics and their treatment [19,33,36,54]. The definition of a systematic effect is somewhat dependent on the context.…”
Section: Jcap04(2018)022mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of systematic effects plays a central role in the analysis of modern CMB experiments (Baxter et al 2015;Bennett et al 2013;BICEP2 Collaboration et al 2016;Louis et al 2016;Planck Collaboration et al 2016c,f) and is the main subject of several papers as well (e.g., Griffiths and Lineweaver (2004); Karakci et al (2013); Miller et al (2009a); Planck Collaboration et al (2016d)), many of them focusing specifically on polarization specific systematics and their treatment (Kaplan and Delabrouille 2002;Miller et al 2009b;Pagano et al 2009;Shimon et al 2008). The definition of a systematic effect is somewhat dependent on the context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of systematic effects plays a central role in the analysis of modern CMB experiments (Baxter et al 2015;Bennett et al 2013;BICEP2 Collaboration et al 2016;Louis et al 2016;Planck Collaboration et al 2016c,f) and is the main subject of several papers as well (e.g., Griffiths and Lineweaver (2004); Karakci et al (2013); Miller et al (2009a); Planck Collaboration et al (2016d)), many of them focusing specifically on polarization specific systematics and their treatment (Kaplan and Delabrouille 2002;Miller et al 2009b;Pagano et al 2009;Shimon et al 2008). The definition of a systematic effect is somewhat dependent on the context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%