2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep39645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the controllability of contextual cuing of visual search

Abstract: Locating a target among distractors improves when the configuration of distractors consistently cues the target’s location across search trials, an effect called contextual cuing of visual search (CC). The important issue of whether CC is automatic has previously been studied by asking whether it can occur implicitly (outside awareness). Here we ask the novel question: is CC of visual search controllable? In 3 experiments participants were exposed to a standard CC procedure during Phase 1. In Phase 2, they loc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vadillo et al (2016) showed that participants are aware of the repeated displays when sufficiently sensitive measures of awareness are used in high-powered experiments. Travis et al (2013) and Vadillo, Giménez-Fernández et al (2020) found that contextual cuing is not completely independent of working memory or selective attention. Finally, Luque et al (2017) showed that contextual cuing is flexible and can be modified in a goal-directed way when participants are instructed to search for another target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vadillo et al (2016) showed that participants are aware of the repeated displays when sufficiently sensitive measures of awareness are used in high-powered experiments. Travis et al (2013) and Vadillo, Giménez-Fernández et al (2020) found that contextual cuing is not completely independent of working memory or selective attention. Finally, Luque et al (2017) showed that contextual cuing is flexible and can be modified in a goal-directed way when participants are instructed to search for another target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the absence of search facilitation for unattended repeated configurations demonstrated that learning could only be expressed, that is used for memory‐guided search, when the repeated configuration was attended. In this context, it is noteworthy that expression of a learned target–distractor pattern apparently can also be blocked by explicit instructions to search for a new, different, target within learned displays (Luque, Vadillo, Lopez, Alonso, & Shanks, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The race-lightness effect appears to show some of the classic hallmarks of automaticity, in that it arises relatively quickly, and apparently without participants being aware of the cue integration process. However, it is also sensitive to high level goals (see Luque, Vadillo, Lopez, Alonso, & Shanks, 2017, for recent analogous discussion in a different domain). Results from many studies however here concur in suggesting that no cognitive phenomena are completely automatic, or completely controlled (Jacoby, 1991;Payne, Jacoby, & Lambert, 2004).…”
Section: Automaticitymentioning
confidence: 99%