1978
DOI: 10.5465/255733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Applicability of the JDI to Various Demographic Groupings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Job Description Index (JDI) developed by Smith, Kendall, and H u h (1969) was used to measure aspects of satisfaction including the work itself, the supervision, the co-workers, the pay, and promotion opportunities. The JDI has been shown to be applicable to employees with different demographic characteristics by Golembiewski and Yeager (1978), and to be valid and reliable by Smith, Smith, and Rollo (1975). For the present sample, coefficient alpha reliabilities were .79 for work, .89 for supervision, .90 for co-workers, .76 for pay, and .88 for promotion opportunities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Job Description Index (JDI) developed by Smith, Kendall, and H u h (1969) was used to measure aspects of satisfaction including the work itself, the supervision, the co-workers, the pay, and promotion opportunities. The JDI has been shown to be applicable to employees with different demographic characteristics by Golembiewski and Yeager (1978), and to be valid and reliable by Smith, Smith, and Rollo (1975). For the present sample, coefficient alpha reliabilities were .79 for work, .89 for supervision, .90 for co-workers, .76 for pay, and .88 for promotion opportunities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability, reliability, and validity of this scale for measuring employee affective responses to the job has been well documented (Golembiewski & Yeager, 1978;Schneider & Dachler, 1978;Smith, Kendall, & Hulin, 1969). Satisfaction with each aspect was assessed, and the five scales were summed to determine overall job satisfaction.…”
Section: Procedures and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The questionnaire provided the respondents with a set of statement of five important facets of job satisfaction i.e., pay, promotion, supervisors, co-workers and work itself. JDI is a reliable facet measure overtime (Kinicki et al2002) and applicable across a variety of demographic groups (Golembiewski and Yeager 1978;Jung, Dalessio and Johnson 1986). The respondents were asked to read carefully all the answers to each of the questions related to five facets of job and then mark the response that come closest to their own feeling on a five-point Likert scale.…”
Section: Collection Of Data and Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%