2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10802-007-9169-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Structural Models of DSM-IV Symptoms of Common Forms of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Abstract: Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) symptoms of common mental disorders derived from structured interviews of a representative sample of 4,049 twin children and adolescents and their adult caretakers. A dimensional model based on the assignment of symptoms to syndromes in DSM-IV fit better than alternative models, but some dimensions were highly correlated. Modest sex and age differences in factor loadings and correlation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

30
356
3
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
30
356
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to findings from past studies that evaluated internal validity of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety disorders and MDD using either the SCAS or RCADS (e.g., De Ross et al, 2002;Spence, 1997;, The findings of Lahey et al (2008) findings did not support the DSM's conceptualization of disorders using the CAPS as reported by either youth or their parents. Lahey et al (2008) also examined whether the internal structure of DSM-IV disorders in youth varied according to youth sex and age. Metric invariance tests of the best fitting factor models for both youth and parents were conducted to examine whether parameters of the models were invariant across youth sex and age (7 to 11 years vs. 12 to 17 years).…”
Section: De Ross Et Al (2002) Conductedcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to findings from past studies that evaluated internal validity of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety disorders and MDD using either the SCAS or RCADS (e.g., De Ross et al, 2002;Spence, 1997;, The findings of Lahey et al (2008) findings did not support the DSM's conceptualization of disorders using the CAPS as reported by either youth or their parents. Lahey et al (2008) also examined whether the internal structure of DSM-IV disorders in youth varied according to youth sex and age. Metric invariance tests of the best fitting factor models for both youth and parents were conducted to examine whether parameters of the models were invariant across youth sex and age (7 to 11 years vs. 12 to 17 years).…”
Section: De Ross Et Al (2002) Conductedcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Shaffer et al, 1996) modified from a "yes" or "no" response format to a four point rating scale (Not At All to Very Much). In contrast to past studies that conducted CFAs on data based on only one informant (e.g., youth only or parent only), Lahey et al, (2008) conducted separate CFAs on both youth completed and parent completed data to test and compare a factor model based on the DSM and a number of alternative factor models that emerged in previous exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) conducted on CAPS data obtained from youths and parents, respectively (Lahey et al, 2004).…”
Section: De Ross Et Al (2002) Conductedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations