The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.4197/eco.28-1.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Some Determinants of Capital Structure “Evidence from Saudi Arabia” Analytical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the results shown in Table 3, there is a negative relationship between the liquidity ratio and the leverage, this enables firms to use this liquidity instead of borrowing from external sources since these firms avoid debt to get rid of the high cost of funds. This is consistent with (Omet and Mashharawe, 2003;Siam et al, 2005;Jong et al, 2008;Ramadan and Alokdeh, 2011;Alzubaidi and Salameh, 2014), and the Pecking Order Theory. But contradicts with the Trade-Off Theory.…”
Section: Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the results shown in Table 3, there is a negative relationship between the liquidity ratio and the leverage, this enables firms to use this liquidity instead of borrowing from external sources since these firms avoid debt to get rid of the high cost of funds. This is consistent with (Omet and Mashharawe, 2003;Siam et al, 2005;Jong et al, 2008;Ramadan and Alokdeh, 2011;Alzubaidi and Salameh, 2014), and the Pecking Order Theory. But contradicts with the Trade-Off Theory.…”
Section: Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
“…7. Liquidity: (Jong et al, 2007;Alzubaidi and Salameh, 2014) showed that there is a negative relationship between the liquidity ratio and the leverage, the firms with higher liquidity ratio, the higher its ability to pay its obligations resulting in lower risk, and will not resort to borrowing to finance operations growth has. Ozkan (2001) pointed out that liquidity has a double impact on the firm's financial structure, where the relationship between the liquidity ratio and debt may negative or positive, that firms with high liquidity ratio will have a high capability to fulfill their obligations, which may have to resort to borrowing In case they need to finance their growth, this shows a positive relationship between the liquidity ratio and the debt, while other firms may use liquidity to finance growth processes instead of borrowing which leads to a low debt, this shows a negative relationship between the liquidity ratio and the debt.…”
Section: Firm Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations