2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing single extraction methods and in vitro tests to assess the geochemical reactivity and human bioaccessibility of silver in urban soils amended with silver nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though pH is a key factor that contributes to the extractability of Ag from soil, the large difference in pH between the three extracts alone is not sufficient to explain the differences in Ag extractability for the glycine or EDTA extraction tests. A study by Cruz et al [60] revealed that the extraction efficiency using dilute (0.43 M) and concentrated (2M) HNO3 extractions was far lower compared to that of the glycine test performed at an 4). Both 0.01 M CaCl 2 and EDTA extracted very low concentrations of Ag from soil: 0.3-0.5 mg kg −1 (CaCl 2 ) and 1.0-1.1 mg kg −1 (EDTA) (corresponding to <3.2%, and <8.5% of total Ag added, respectively).…”
Section: Potential Availability Of Ag Retained In the Solid Matrixmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though pH is a key factor that contributes to the extractability of Ag from soil, the large difference in pH between the three extracts alone is not sufficient to explain the differences in Ag extractability for the glycine or EDTA extraction tests. A study by Cruz et al [60] revealed that the extraction efficiency using dilute (0.43 M) and concentrated (2M) HNO3 extractions was far lower compared to that of the glycine test performed at an 4). Both 0.01 M CaCl 2 and EDTA extracted very low concentrations of Ag from soil: 0.3-0.5 mg kg −1 (CaCl 2 ) and 1.0-1.1 mg kg −1 (EDTA) (corresponding to <3.2%, and <8.5% of total Ag added, respectively).…”
Section: Potential Availability Of Ag Retained In the Solid Matrixmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A study by Cruz Even though pH is a key factor that contributes to the extractability of Ag from soil, the large difference in pH between the three extracts alone is not sufficient to explain the differences in Ag extractability for the glycine or EDTA extraction tests. A study by Cruz et al [60] revealed that the extraction efficiency using dilute (0.43 M) and concentrated (2M) HNO 3 extractions was far lower compared to that of the glycine test performed at an equally acid level (pH 1.5). This confirmed that both low pH and the presence of complexing ligands that form very stable complexes with Ag are required to release appreciable amounts of Ag retained in soil [27,60].…”
Section: Potential Availability Of Ag Retained In the Solid Matrixmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the simplified bioaccessibility extraction test (SBET) [28] and the unified bioaccessibility method (UBM) [29] have been employed for determining the bioaccessible fraction of PTE in PM [3034]. In some cases, the PM 10 was obtained from urban soil samples [30, 31] or from urban street dust [32] whilst, in others, filter-based samples were used [33, 34]. A recent study [34] miniaturised the SBET and the stomach phase of the UBM, and successfully applied the methods developed to measure the bioaccessible fraction of PTE in PM 10 supported on TX40 filters employed in the filter dynamics measurement system (FDMS) samplers widely used for continuous monitoring of ambient particulate matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The bioaccessibility research group of Europe (BARGE) produced a more complex test, the unied bioaccessibility method (UBM), 23 by modifying an in vitro method originally created by researchers at the Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. [29][30][31] The SBET 32-40 and the UBM 6, [28][29][30][31]39,41,42 have been employed to determine the bioaccessible PTE fraction in a variety of substrates, notably urban soils, 29,30,32,34,41 soils impacted by mine waste or pesticides and herbicides, [35][36][37]40 and street dust. The UBM was evaluated by means of an international inter-laboratory exercise 25 and validated 26 for As, Cd, Pb and Sb in soils by conducting in vivo swine studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%