2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-6774(03)00019-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing satisfiability

Abstract: Let Φ be a set of general boolean functions on n variables, such that each function depends on exactly k variables, and each variable can take a value from [1, d]. We say that Φ is -far from satisfiable, if one must remove at least n k functions in order to make the set of remaining functions satisfiable. Our main result is that if Φ is -far from satisfiable, then most of the induced sets of functions, on sets of variables of size c(k, d)/ 2 , are not satisfiable, where c(k, d) depends only on k and d. Using t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method here improves this result and shows that a sample of size O((1/ ) min(s,t) ) suffices. This nearly matches a lower bound of Ω((1/ ) min(s,t)/2 ) which follows by considering an appropriate random graph (see the full version of [9]. )…”
Section: Proposition 81supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our method here improves this result and shows that a sample of size O((1/ ) min(s,t) ) suffices. This nearly matches a lower bound of Ω((1/ ) min(s,t)/2 ) which follows by considering an appropriate random graph (see the full version of [9]. )…”
Section: Proposition 81supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The notion of property testing has been investigated in other areas as well, including the context of regular languages, [6], functions [23], [9], [3], computational geometry [18], [4] as well as graph and hypergraph coloring [17], [9], [15]. See [31] and [22] for surveys on the topic.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results relate the optimal solution value of the whole problem to a complicated function of the random sub-problems like [7] (see also [7], [5] and [2] for higher dimensional cases, or for cases in which our only objective is to decide if we can satisfy almost all constraints). Thus they differ from our new uniform method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item (4) in Lemma 2.7 states that each U i contains at least n/S( ) vertices. Also, by (6), and by the monotonicity properties of M 2.3 discussed in Comment 2.4, we have for any 1 ≤ i ≤ k…”
Section: If For Some I < J We Have |D(vmentioning
confidence: 76%