2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing protostellar disk formation models with ALMA observations

Abstract: Context. Recent simulations have explored different ways to form accretion disks around low-mass stars. However, it has been difficult to differentiate between the proposed mechanisms because of a lack of observable predictions from these numerical studies. Aims. We aim to present observables that can differentiate a rotationally supported disk from an infalling rotating envelope toward deeply embedded young stellar objects (M env > M disk ) and infer their masses and sizes. Methods. Two 3D magnetohydrodynamic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our modeling of protostellar envelopes and disks around the other protostellar sources as observed with ALMA reveals that geometrically-thin envelope / disk models reproduce the observed features reasonably well (e.g., Aso et al 2015;Yen et al 2017;Takakuwa et al 2017). The formation of so-called pseudo-disks is also expected from several MHD simulations (Machida et al 2011a;Harsono et al 2015;Tomida et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, our modeling of protostellar envelopes and disks around the other protostellar sources as observed with ALMA reveals that geometrically-thin envelope / disk models reproduce the observed features reasonably well (e.g., Aso et al 2015;Yen et al 2017;Takakuwa et al 2017). The formation of so-called pseudo-disks is also expected from several MHD simulations (Machida et al 2011a;Harsono et al 2015;Tomida et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We note, however, that there is likely a significant contamination from the outflow component to the 13 CO (2-1) emission (Figure 2), which makes this simple one-zone LTE analysis infeasible. On the other hand, the observed peak brightness temperature of the C 18 O (2-1) emission ( 1.6 K) is well below the anticipated gas temperature of the protostellar envelope (∼ 20 K) (Aso et al 2015;Harsono et al 2015), which suggests that the C 18 O (2-1) emission is likely optically thin.…”
Section: Line Profilesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast, when taking into account the large-scale emission Harsono et al (2015) find that disc masses inferred from millimetre observations agree rather well with the actual mass. They also investigate the dynamics of a Keplerian disc by means of synthetic CO line emission maps.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In spite of increased computational costs, the models such as presented in Paper I are self-consistent and can be used threefold: for matching the observations, for calculating nonideal MHD terms, and for the thermal chemical feedback (i.e. cooling with atomic or molecular lines) (Hincelin et al 2016;Harsono et al 2015;Gerin et al 2015). We leave the atomic/molecular lines cooling for the follow-up studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%