2011
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.025874-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing probiotic strain Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (Mutaflor) for its ability to reduce carriage of multidrug-resistant E. coli by elderly residents in long-term care facilities

Abstract: A high carriage rate of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli (MDREC) was observed in elderly residents in long-term care facilities. A double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was carried out to determine whether the probiotic product E. coli strain Nissle 1917 (Mutaflor) would compete with MDREC in the bowel and thereby reduce the prevalence of the multiresistant bacteria in faeces and urine. Sixty-nine patients excreting norfloxacin-resistant E. coli were randomized to probiotic or placebo groups and adminis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-pathogenic E . coli strains such as Nissle 1917 (EcN) are also classified as probiotics and have been studied in animals, normal volunteers, and elderly patients [60-64]. …”
Section: Are There Methods To Prevent or Treat Gut Colonisation With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-pathogenic E . coli strains such as Nissle 1917 (EcN) are also classified as probiotics and have been studied in animals, normal volunteers, and elderly patients [60-64]. …”
Section: Are There Methods To Prevent or Treat Gut Colonisation With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of a probiotic product containing different species (Bifidobacterium bifidum, B. lactis, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus L. paracasei, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, and L. salivarius) against ampicillin-resistant enterococcal intestinal colonization was studied in wards with a documented high prevalence of such bacteria, but the probiotics could not prevent colonization by the resistant enterococci (24). Other published assays concern resistant E. coli: a doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate whether a probiotic product with E. coli strain Nissle 1917 (Mutaflor) could compete with the multidrug-resistant E. coli isolates in patients in long-term-care facilities, but after 5 weeks of treatment, the authors did not observe a significant difference in the carriage of multiresistant E. coli between the probiotic and placebo groups (25). These disappointing observations concerning the ability of probiotics to competitively exclude resistant bacteria are somewhat counterbalanced by the findings described in a paper by Nuotio et al (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the initial results for carbapenemase carriers appeared promising (122), those obtained subsequently with ESBL-E carriers were disappointing, with short-lived ESBL-E elimination after the end of the procedure (123). Others have tried to use probiotics (124), but this was also a failure. Overall, it seems that far more research is warranted in the field before any practical solution can be proposed.…”
Section: How To Prevent and Reduce Esbl Carriage In Community Populatmentioning
confidence: 99%