Testing of the Nursing Evidence‐Based Practice Survey

Crawford, Cecelia L.; Rondinelli, June; Zuniga, Stephen; Valdez, Regina M.; Cullen, Laura; Hanrahan, Kirsten; Titler, Marita G.

doi:10.1111/wvn.12432

Cited by 15 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 20 publications

(25 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The importance of a master's degree has also been recognized in other research (Chang & Levin, 2014; Chen et al., 2020; Gallagher‐Ford et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2016; Skela‐Savič et al., 2020; Yoo et al., 2019). Contrary to previous research results (Chen et al., 2020; Crawford et al., 2020; Stokke et al., 2014; Yoo et al., 2019), access to databases was not a significant factor for reported beliefs on and implementation of EBP in our study.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Differences in beliefs on and implementation of evidence‐based practice according to type of health care institution—A national cross‐sectional study among Slovenian nurses

Skela-Savič

Lobe

2020

J Nurs Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To explore the differences in beliefs on and implementation of evidence-based practice in nurses working in different types of health care institutions. Background: Optimal organizational context and knowledge are essential to support evidence-based practice and sustain the use of evidence in professional nursing practice. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 1,014 nurses from 20 Slovenian hospitals and 29 primary health care centres participated. Variables included the following: Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Implementation Scale, educational and training activities, job satisfaction, job training, perceived research and evidence-based practice knowledge, and access to databases. Results: Beliefs on evidence-based practice were explained by evidence-based practice (β = 0.249) and research (β = 0.162) knowledge, length of employment (β = 0.124), job satisfaction (β = 0.117), training in evidence-based practice (β = −0.092) and holding a master's degree (β = 0.077). Implementation of evidence-based practice depended on beliefs (β = 0.306) and the type of health care institution (β = 0.132). The highest implementation result was seen in primary health care centres (<0.001). Conclusion: Training in evidence-based practice and perceived knowledge of evidence-based practice significantly influence the beliefs on and implementation of evidence-based practice. Nurses employed at primary health care centres who had completed a task-shifting training programme achieved significantly better results for implementation of evidence-based practice. Implications for Nursing Management: The indirect effects of development training programmes for the implementation of EBP have not yet been studied. Development activities and change implementation processes in nursing foster education and training opportunities, which have significantly influenced the implementation of EBP.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, in a comparison of EBP results between nurses working in hospitals and medical offices, Crawford et al. (2020) showed that the first group received a better result compared to the second group. Conversely, our study showed that inclusion into 24‐hr hospital care is not a factor of successful EBP implementation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in beliefs on and implementation of evidence‐based practice according to type of health care institution—A national cross‐sectional study among Slovenian nurses

Skela-Savič

Lobe

2020

J Nurs Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We look for problems who underwent prosthetic tively seek evidence, deal with problems, and improve the quality of clinical nursing services. 14 The results of this study showed that the psychological state of patients in the study group was better than control group after intervention, and the scores of HADS-A and HADS-D in the study group were lower than control group. It is indicated the anxiety and depression score of the study group was lower than the control group, and the same as the mental health level of the study group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

“…At the same time, evidence‐based nursing is a nursing model established through the continuous transformation and development from traditional clinical nursing concepts to modern nursing models. It can encourage nurses to use critical thinking develop approaches, actively seek evidence, deal with problems, and improve the quality of clinical nursing services 14 . The results of this study showed that the psychological state of patients in the study group was better than control group after intervention, and the scores of HADS‐A and HADS‐D in the study group were lower than control group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Application of evidence‐based nursing in prevention of postoperative complications of breast augmentation

Gao

Liu

et al. 2021

J of Cosmetic Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To study the application of evidence‐based nursing in prosthesis postoperative complications. Methods A total of 78 cases of patients who underwent prosthetic breast augmentation were selected from July 2017 to July 2019. All the patients were divided into control group and study group according to the random number table method. The patients in the control group received routine nursing interventions, and the patients in the study group performed evidence‐based nursing interventions based on the control group's care. The mental health, external esthetic effects, and complications of the two groups were observed and compared. Results Before the implementation of nursing intervention, there was no significant difference in mental health indicators (SAS, SDS) between the two groups (p > 0.05). After the intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of the two groups were lower than before the intervention, and the study group was lower than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05); before the implementation of nursing intervention, there was no significant difference in the scores of HADS‐A and HADS‐D between the two groups (p > 0.05). After the intervention, the scores of HADS‐A and HADS‐D of the two groups were lower than those before the intervention, and the scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05); 94.9% (37 / 39) was better than 71. 8% (28 / 39) in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), and the total incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was 5.1% (2 / 39), which was lower than 15.4% (6 / 39) in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion Evidence‐based nursing intervention is effective in preventing postoperative complications of silicone breast augmentation prosthesis. It can effectively reduce postoperative complications, improve external esthetic effects, and improve the level of mental health of patients. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

show abstract

“…Intermountain Healthcare has over 300 nurse educators supporting over 10 000 registered nurses across the organization. The Council conducted a systemwide survey to assess baseline understanding of evidence-based practice implementation using a validated instrument 4. Based on the findings, Intermountain decided to invite faculty from the Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare at The Ohio State University to train interested nurses from across the enterprise.…”

Section: Education and Networkingmentioning

confidence: 99%