2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of mechanical properties of thick-walled carbon fiber composite for FEM simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study explored the method of obtaining elastic engineering constants ( E 1 , E 2 and v 12 ) of woven lamina required for simulation of thick laminates by conducting thin laminate tensile tests [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study explored the method of obtaining elastic engineering constants ( E 1 , E 2 and v 12 ) of woven lamina required for simulation of thick laminates by conducting thin laminate tensile tests [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slight mismatch was found when experimental and numerical results were compared [26]. A numerical study for predicting the flexural strength of thick-walled carbon fiber reinforced composites (CFRP) was conducted by taking engineering constants from the tensile test of thin-walled CFRP composites [27]. The error for unidirectional composites was found to be 10%, while for woven composites, more than 10% error was encountered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modeling method, due to good numerical effi ciency of the model, can be used in the static analyses of structural elements made of laminates [6,7]. However, such a modeling method can cause erroneous simulation results [7,8], and simulating delamination with its help requires the use of special computational methods (e.g. VCCT [9], cohesive zone method [10]), which signifi cantly reduce the numerical effi ciency of the model and require predicting the location of potential damage sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%