2015 30th International Power System Conference (PSC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ipsc.2015.7827733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of differential relay operation for power transformers protection using RTDS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A successful monitoring system can thus minimize downtime and prevent transformer failure by triggering tailored predictive maintenance. The most common transformer monitoring techniques include thermal analysis, winding vibration, motion and deformation analysis, dissolve gas analysis, partial discharge analysis, and tapping under load analysis [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A successful monitoring system can thus minimize downtime and prevent transformer failure by triggering tailored predictive maintenance. The most common transformer monitoring techniques include thermal analysis, winding vibration, motion and deformation analysis, dissolve gas analysis, partial discharge analysis, and tapping under load analysis [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In HiL, RTDS reproduces events that can appear in an electric power system modelled in RSCAD software, generating currents and voltages seen by the relay during a fault and recording the relay behavior. Examples of RTDS test applications can be found in [19][20][21][22]. In this study, RTDS publishes and subscribes sampled values using IEC 61850-9-2 LE profile [23] and GOOSE messages using IEC 61850-8-1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The urgency of the problem is associated with the severity of the consequences (costs, damage) that arise as a result of errors in the diagnosis, based on which untimely and unjustified decisions are made to withdraw equipment for repair or refuse to repair. Numerous studies have been devoted to solving this problem, the results of which are particularly reflected in the following publications [1]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is customary to distinguish between instrumental and methodical reliability of diagnosis [1]. Instrumental reliability is determined by the composition and stability of the object's diagnostic parameters, the specified tolerances, as well as the accuracy, sensitivity, and condition of the measuring instruments [4], [5]. Methodical reliability, as a rule, is associated with the processing of measurement results, the choice of diagnostic features, and criteria for assessing the technical condition of the equipment [6]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%