2002
DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2002.489.491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of Cotton Leaf Curl Virus Resistance of Candidate Varieties/strains Through Different Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, plant biotechnology can provide a quick and direct method of introducing a gene of interest into crops, which seems to be a more attractive approach for improving resistance against different threats (Cushman and Bohnert, 2000). Through screening methods, the cultivar CIM-482 showed resistant to tolerant behavior to CLCuV infection in Punjab in 2000 (Mahmood et al, 2002;Perveen et al, 2005). Recently, however, this cultivar was also found to be susceptible to a great extent to CLCuV disease, due to a resistance-breaking combination of virus and satellite DNA or changing environmental conditions suitable for its establishment and the presence of whitefly, the insect vector of CLCuV (Sattar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, plant biotechnology can provide a quick and direct method of introducing a gene of interest into crops, which seems to be a more attractive approach for improving resistance against different threats (Cushman and Bohnert, 2000). Through screening methods, the cultivar CIM-482 showed resistant to tolerant behavior to CLCuV infection in Punjab in 2000 (Mahmood et al, 2002;Perveen et al, 2005). Recently, however, this cultivar was also found to be susceptible to a great extent to CLCuV disease, due to a resistance-breaking combination of virus and satellite DNA or changing environmental conditions suitable for its establishment and the presence of whitefly, the insect vector of CLCuV (Sattar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%