2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of actively cooled mock-ups in several high heat flux facilities—An International Round Robin Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, it is very important to address the correlation of the evaluated results from different facilities since all of them have different machine parameters. To access the correlation between the results from different facilities, Round Robin Tests have been done by JUDITH, JEBIS, FE200, EBTS, TSEFFY and JET NBI Testbed 59,60) with the same nominal power density on the same mock-ups in those facilities. The main conclusion from these tests is that the surface temperatures evolution with power densities, fairly agreed with each other, although there were systematic deviation.…”
Section: Non-destructive Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, it is very important to address the correlation of the evaluated results from different facilities since all of them have different machine parameters. To access the correlation between the results from different facilities, Round Robin Tests have been done by JUDITH, JEBIS, FE200, EBTS, TSEFFY and JET NBI Testbed 59,60) with the same nominal power density on the same mock-ups in those facilities. The main conclusion from these tests is that the surface temperatures evolution with power densities, fairly agreed with each other, although there were systematic deviation.…”
Section: Non-destructive Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed discussion on the deviation can be found in references. 59,60) The crucial points are (1) surface temperature measurement and (2) power density calibration. Calibration of surface temperature should have been done at each facility because of the different specification and alignment of optical thermometers (detecting wavelength, angle and window materials).…”
Section: Non-destructive Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These cover different design options (flat tile, monoblock) and different joining techniques for both, CFC and tungsten armor [3]. Mainly high power electron beam facilities [12] have been used for testing of these mock-ups by simulation of ITER relevant loading conditions.…”
Section: Thermal Fatigue Behavior Of Plasma Facing Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1). Normal operation conditions on actively cooled components are mainly performed in electron or ion beam test facilities (Ref [157][158][159]. Electron beam devices use focused beams with diameters ranging from typically 1 to 10 mm; to provide homogeneous thermal loads to the full surface of the module and to control the pattern size and shape, fast beam scanning modes (e.g., saw tooth-filled, triangular-filled rectangles or TV-raster scans with flyback) are applied.…”
Section: High Heat Flux Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%