2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10168-012-0032-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of a Device for Positioning Measuring Microphones in Anechoic and Reverberation Chambers

Abstract: This paper presents a mechanical positioning system for a measuring microphone designed for acoustic studies in anechoic and reverberation chambers at the Department of Mechanics and Vibroacoustics, AGH. The results are discussed in the context of mechanical positioning and its impact on the outcome of the execution of individual measurement procedures. Moreover, areas for research were identified and solution concepts shown for further development of the automation of acoustic measurements in different resear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). The sound source was located 4 m above a sample and the position of a microphone changed from an angle 0 to 90 degrees (Felis et al, 2012;Batko et al, 2008). The tested samples were rectangular in plan and had two or four edges curved with varied radii (Figs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). The sound source was located 4 m above a sample and the position of a microphone changed from an angle 0 to 90 degrees (Felis et al, 2012;Batko et al, 2008). The tested samples were rectangular in plan and had two or four edges curved with varied radii (Figs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A round test sample was mounted on the turntable in the reverberation chamber (Felis et al, 2012). The height of the measurement table was 130 mm.…”
Section: Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total length of recordings amounts to 4 h and 30 min. The quality of the recordings is proper, as they were made in an anechoic chamber with high-end recording devices (Felis et al 2012). Original recordings were sampled at 44.1 kHz to meet the expectations of speech synthesis, but for the purpose of ASR training and tests, we also prepared a downsampled 16 kHz version with the use of SoX software.…”
Section: Tts Training Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%