2010
DOI: 10.1097/nnr.0b013e3181dd26b3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Mediation in Nursing Research

Abstract: Background-Baron and Kenny (1986) defined mediation and described how to perform statistical tests of mediation hypotheses. Their approach to testing mediation has been used extensively in the nursing literature. However, many statisticians have identified problems with the Baron and Kenny approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…28,29 All statistical analyses were conducted with SAS software (version 9.2, 2010, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 All statistical analyses were conducted with SAS software (version 9.2, 2010, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint significance approach to mediation is the best of the all the causal steps approaches because it has more statistical power and the lowest Type I error rate (Krause et al, 2010). Table 3 lists the variables tested in the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One statistical limitation with these studies is that researchers have not tested whether ABM has an indirect effect on behaviour via changes in AB, which is possible even in the absence of a direct effect of ABM on behaviour (see Krause et al, 2010). However, we conducted these analyses on datasets from three single-session ABM studies conducted in our laboratory (Field et al, 2007;Field, Duka, Tyler, & Schoenmakers, 2009;Field & Eastwood, 2005) and did not observe any statistically significant indirect effects (details available on request).…”
Section: The Causal Role Of Attentional Bias: Attentional Bias Modifimentioning
confidence: 90%