2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-010-0455-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing mechanistic explanations for mammalian predator responses to habitat edges

Abstract: Increased predator activity along habitat edges (the edge effect) is often documented in the temperate zone, but earlier studies have rarely been able to explicitly test the suggested mechanisms underlining this phenomenon. In this study, we measured the distribution of mammalian predators by scent stations and their main prey (rodents) in four types of landscape elements corresponding to an edge gradient between two habitat types; grassland and forest. We found a contrasting pattern in carnivore activities be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(53 reference statements)
3
13
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our previous results Svobodová et al 2011) and other studies (Paton 1994;Dijak and Thompson 2000;Larivière and Messier 2000), we document that the distribution of mammalian mesopredators in a fragmented landscape in Central Europe is primarily restricted to the narrow strip of forest edges. Due to the large home ranges of carnivores (Mitchell-Jones et al 1999), this pattern is likely to correspond to spatial preferences within the particular home range of each individual predator, rather than to the disproportional distribution of individual home ranges across the edge-interior gradient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with our previous results Svobodová et al 2011) and other studies (Paton 1994;Dijak and Thompson 2000;Larivière and Messier 2000), we document that the distribution of mammalian mesopredators in a fragmented landscape in Central Europe is primarily restricted to the narrow strip of forest edges. Due to the large home ranges of carnivores (Mitchell-Jones et al 1999), this pattern is likely to correspond to spatial preferences within the particular home range of each individual predator, rather than to the disproportional distribution of individual home ranges across the edge-interior gradient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The strength of the edge effect can be closely connected to landscape type, level of habitat fragmentation, and type of habitat edge (Andrén 1995;Donovan et al 1997;Dijak and Thompson 2000;Keyser 2002;Malt and Lank 2009), and may even vary temporally (Svobodová et al 2011). The elevated activity of predators along habitat edges has been documented especially in highly and moderately fragmented landscapes (Donovan et al 1997;Lahti 2001), as well as in areas with intense agriculture or residential development (Bayne and Hobson 1997;Dijak and Thompson 2000;Keyser 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, our study indicates that predation risk between habitat edges and interiors may exhibit temporal variation. Thus, grassland-forest edges appear to be important landscape elements that contribute to trophic interactions and other ecological processes in the Central European landscape (see also Storch et al 2005;Svobodová et al 2011;Šálek et al 2010). The question thus arises, what underlies this large temporal variation in predation risk along the ecotonal interface in our study?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(2) Some predator species specifically more often use edge habitats because complementary resources from both habitat types are accessible near the edge and/or resources are concentrated along edges (ecotonal effect model, sensu Lidicker 1999; see more details on other conceptual models of the edge effect by Svobodová et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%