Abstract:The use of behavioral science interventions, and particularly social norms, in tax compliance is a growing industry for scholars and practitioners alike in recent years. However, the causal mechanism of these interventions is unknown, where effects could be explained by a pro-social desire to support one's community, conditional cooperation, desire to conform, or fear of reprisals. We conduct a field experiment in local government taxation in the United Kingdom which tests the effectiveness of a social (descri… Show more
“…We must understand the specific context in which the targeted behavior occurs (see discussion in Gino et al, 2019). In addition, despite a long tradition in social psychology, philosophy, and economic literature showing when, why, and how individuals react and conform to descriptive and normative information of peers (e.g., Deutsch and Gerard, 1955;Cialdini and Trost, 1998;Gino et al, 2009;Cialdini and Goldstein, 2004;Bicchieri, 2006;Schultz et al, 2007;Bicchieri et al, 2019a;Dimant, 2019;van Kleef et al, 2019), science is still working towards a better understanding of how to properly frame norm-nudges, which is a highly debated topic in ongoing research (see discussions in, e.g., Bicchieri and Dimant, 2019;Larkin et al, 2019). It is important to advance our understanding on how to best frame norm-nudges because better framing can serve as a cost-effective way to increase the effectiveness of nudge interventions.…”
We examine framing effects in nudging honesty, in the spirit of the growing norm-nudge literature, by utilizing a high-powered and pre-registered study. Across four treatments, participants received one random truthful norm-nudge that emphasized 'moral suasion' based on either what other participants previously did (empirical message) or approved of doing (normative message) and varied in the framing (positive or negative) in which it was presented. Subsequently, participants repeatedly played the 'mind game' in which they were first asked to think of a number, then rolled a digital die, and then reported whether the two numbers coincide, in which case a bonus was paid. Hence, whether or not the report was truthful remained unobservable to the experimenters. We find compelling null effects with tight confidence intervals showing that none of the norm-nudge interventions worked. A follow-up experiment reveals the reason for these convincing null-effects: the information norm-nudges did not actually change norms. Notably, our secondary results suggest that a substantial portion of individuals misremembered norm-nudges such that they conveniently supported deviant behavior. This subset of participants indeed displayed significantly higher deviance levels, a behavior pattern in line with literature on motivated misremembering and belief distortion. We discuss the importance of this high-powered null finding for the flourishing norm-nudge literature and derive policy implications.
“…We must understand the specific context in which the targeted behavior occurs (see discussion in Gino et al, 2019). In addition, despite a long tradition in social psychology, philosophy, and economic literature showing when, why, and how individuals react and conform to descriptive and normative information of peers (e.g., Deutsch and Gerard, 1955;Cialdini and Trost, 1998;Gino et al, 2009;Cialdini and Goldstein, 2004;Bicchieri, 2006;Schultz et al, 2007;Bicchieri et al, 2019a;Dimant, 2019;van Kleef et al, 2019), science is still working towards a better understanding of how to properly frame norm-nudges, which is a highly debated topic in ongoing research (see discussions in, e.g., Bicchieri and Dimant, 2019;Larkin et al, 2019). It is important to advance our understanding on how to best frame norm-nudges because better framing can serve as a cost-effective way to increase the effectiveness of nudge interventions.…”
We examine framing effects in nudging honesty, in the spirit of the growing norm-nudge literature, by utilizing a high-powered and pre-registered study. Across four treatments, participants received one random truthful norm-nudge that emphasized 'moral suasion' based on either what other participants previously did (empirical message) or approved of doing (normative message) and varied in the framing (positive or negative) in which it was presented. Subsequently, participants repeatedly played the 'mind game' in which they were first asked to think of a number, then rolled a digital die, and then reported whether the two numbers coincide, in which case a bonus was paid. Hence, whether or not the report was truthful remained unobservable to the experimenters. We find compelling null effects with tight confidence intervals showing that none of the norm-nudge interventions worked. A follow-up experiment reveals the reason for these convincing null-effects: the information norm-nudges did not actually change norms. Notably, our secondary results suggest that a substantial portion of individuals misremembered norm-nudges such that they conveniently supported deviant behavior. This subset of participants indeed displayed significantly higher deviance levels, a behavior pattern in line with literature on motivated misremembering and belief distortion. We discuss the importance of this high-powered null finding for the flourishing norm-nudge literature and derive policy implications.
“…Third, although robust evidence concerning information provision to influence household behaviour in the UK water sector is scarce, there is growing experimental evidence from other locations, notably the US (Ferrao and Miranda, 2013;Ferraro and Price, 2013), and from other sectors, such as consumer finance (Bertrand et al, 2010), energy (Allcott, 2011) and tax compliance (Larkin et al, 2018). Hence, there are learnings on offer that may be helpful to deal with the challenges mentioned above.…”
Following the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) of the UK's call in its recent Water Efficiency and Behaviour Change Rapid Evidence Assessment 2018, this paper seeks to understand the key barriers of conducting effective information-based interventions to encourage household water efficiency in England and Wales and the associated implications. We review the evidence of information provision to conserve water in England and Wales. We then set out the current key barriers, highlight what might have constituted to the barriers and, based on learnings from the literature, clarify some underlying confusion and suggest ways to improve.
“…Recent scholarship has demonstrated how social norms predictably influence individual behavior in such domains as enhancing tax compliance (e.g., Coleman, 1996; Hallsworth et al, 2017; Larkin et al, 2019), promoting the conservation of residential energy (e.g., Allcott, 2011; Cialdini and Schultz, 2004; Schultz et al., 2007) and water (Bhanot, 2018), preserving petrified woods (e.g., Cialdini et al, 2006), increasing curbside recycling (e.g., Schultz, 1999), sustaining charitable giving in wills (e.g., Behavioral Insight Team, 2013), nurturing prosocial behavior (Krupka and Weber, 2009), and reducing youth initiation to smoking (e.g., Linkenbach and Wesley Perkins, 2003). However, there is a dearth of research focused on how social norms affect public employee behavior.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
We draw on the focus theory of normative conduct and nudge theory to experimentally test the effect of descriptive social norms on desired behaviors that public employees may engage in at suboptimal levels, namely, vaccination and help-seeking. Through a series of framed randomized controlled trials with 19,984 public healthcare professionals, we demonstrate that descriptive norms-doing what the majority of others do-trigger conformity. Specifically, employees are more likely to get a flu shot and advocate vaccination when knowing that the majority of their colleagues get vaccinated against the seasonal influenza compared to when most colleagues do not. Similarly, the probability of making help requests on the job is noticeably higher when asking colleagues for advice is the norm rather than not. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these experiments for scholars and policy makers interested in predictably altering high-stakes behaviors among public employees through low-powered incentives.
Evidence for Practice• Public organizations and their managers can leverage social norms to fuel desired behaviors that employees may otherwise engage in at suboptimal levels. • Public organizations with high vaccination coverage rates can promote vaccination by informing their employees that the majority of their colleagues get the flu shot. • Public organizations with low vaccination coverage rates must implement interventions to increase vaccination coverage before they can take advantage of the effect of descriptive social norms. • Explicitly communicating that asking colleagues for help is a desirable social norm can foster widespread adoption of this behavior, which in turn can trigger helping at work.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.