2000
DOI: 10.1145/382912.382923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Intrusion detection systems

Abstract: In 1998 and again in 1999, the Lincoln Laboratory of MIT conducted a comparative evaluation of intrusion detection systems (IDSs) developed under DARPA funding. While this evaluation represents a significant and monumental undertaking, there are a number of issues associated with its design and execution that remain unsettled. Some methodologies used in the evaluation are questionable and may have biased its results. One problem is that the evaluators have published relatively little concerning some of the mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
272
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,027 publications
(291 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
272
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This data set is based on KDD-99 database on the initiative of the American Association for Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) [39]. To conduct research in the field of intrusion detection, a set of communication data was compiled and covered a wide range of various intrusions simulated in an environment that mimics the US Air Force network.…”
Section: Datasets and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data set is based on KDD-99 database on the initiative of the American Association for Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) [39]. To conduct research in the field of intrusion detection, a set of communication data was compiled and covered a wide range of various intrusions simulated in an environment that mimics the US Air Force network.…”
Section: Datasets and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a total of 41 features which are classified into Basic, Content and Traffic features. KDDCup is developed on the basis of DARPA'98 data and this data has been criticized by McHugh [5]. As a result, some of inherited issues also exist in KDD-Cup like redundancy of similar records and complexity level of data behavior.…”
Section: A Selection Of Suitable Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KDD-Cup 99 is most widely used as a benchmark dataset for training and testing of Intrusion detection systems. KDD-CUP 99 is built based on the data captured in DARPA'98 which has been criticized by McHugh [5], mainly because of the characteristics of the synthetic data. One of the most important deficiencies in the KDD data set is the huge number of redundant records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used Naive Bayes, Random Forest and PART along with feature reduction schemes to classify the NSL KDD dataset [2] into normal and attacked types. Both training and testing data is used along with 10-fold cross validation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%