Abstract:We report on an experimental investigation of the emergence of Spontaneous Order, the idea that societies can coordinate , without government intervention, on a form of society that is good for its citizens, as described by Adam Smith. Our experimental design is based on a production game with a convex input provision possibility frontier, where subjects have to choose a point on this frontier. We start with a simple society consisting of just two people, two inputs, one final good and in which the production … Show more
“…They observe that groups are quite adept at realizing internal coordination, but efficient specialization and trade across groups are harder to establish. Georgalos & Hey (2020) investigate whether group members coordinate in a production environment with returns to specialization. They do not find evidence for spontaneous order and optimal division of labor without communication.…”
Following Garicano (2000), we consider groups whose members decide what knowledge to acquire and how to use this knowledge in production. If efficient production requires common knowledge, all group members should become workers and acquire common knowledge. But if efficient production requires diverse knowledge, one group member should become manager, acquire rare knowledge, and stand ready to help the other workers. In our laboratory experiment, we find that most groups eventually manage to coordinate on an efficient division of labor. Still, we find substantial adoption frictions. Coordination takes time, and some groups coordinate on an inefficient division of labor, probably because they do not understand what organization of knowledge is most efficient.
“…They observe that groups are quite adept at realizing internal coordination, but efficient specialization and trade across groups are harder to establish. Georgalos & Hey (2020) investigate whether group members coordinate in a production environment with returns to specialization. They do not find evidence for spontaneous order and optimal division of labor without communication.…”
Following Garicano (2000), we consider groups whose members decide what knowledge to acquire and how to use this knowledge in production. If efficient production requires common knowledge, all group members should become workers and acquire common knowledge. But if efficient production requires diverse knowledge, one group member should become manager, acquire rare knowledge, and stand ready to help the other workers. In our laboratory experiment, we find that most groups eventually manage to coordinate on an efficient division of labor. Still, we find substantial adoption frictions. Coordination takes time, and some groups coordinate on an inefficient division of labor, probably because they do not understand what organization of knowledge is most efficient.
“…Ultimately, the theoretical basis for making a distinction between individual-level and organizational-level constructs rests on the now widely accepted concept of emergence – where novel traits, characteristics, properties, and behaviors can be expected to appear as systems become more complex (Gao & Xu, 2021; Georgalos & Hey, 2020; Walsh & Brady, 2019). The concept of emergent properties is also a significant aspect of systems theory , which is a theoretical perspective that upholds that the properties of the totality of a system offer far more variety than the properties of any single component of the system (Gao & Xu, 2021; Scott, 2001; Waterson, 2015).…”
The process of organizational sensemaking initially attracted empirical attention as a tool for retrospectively assessing organizational decision-making during critical incidents (Weick, 1988, 1993). However, recent advancements in multilevel theory design have created an opportunity to re-envision organizational sensemaking not only as an individual and retrospective process but as a broader macro-cognitive and multilevel organizational system. The identification and intentional design of organizational sensemaking systems can potentially facilitate present and future decision-making processes and organizational change management. Using the organizational sensemaking systems paradigm proposed by Hughes, et al. (2022), this study builds on the inductive assessment of a significant organizational change effort to extract novel theoretical propositions of the emergent properties of organizational sensemaking systems. Results include the identification of properties of organizational sensemaking systems and a series of theoretical propositions about the nature of sensemaking emergence. The potential implications for change management practice and future empirical work are discussed.
“… See Brandts et al (2019) for a survey. As far as we are aware,Penczynski (2018) andGeorgalos and Hey (2019) are the only published studies that propose a machine learning approach. More on this in Section 4.…”
We study the interaction of the effects of the strategic environment and communication on the observed levels of cooperation in two-person finitely repeated games with a Pareto-inefficient Nash equilibrium and replicate previous findings that point to higher levels of tacit cooperation under strategic complementarity than under strategic substitutability. We find that this is not because of differences in the levels of reciprocity as previously suggested. Instead, we demonstrate that slow learning coupled with noisy choices may drive this effect. When subjects are allowed to communicate in free-form online chats before making choices, cooperation levels increase significantly to the extent that the difference between strategic complements and substitutes disappears. A machine-assisted natural language processing approach then shows how the content of communication is dependent on the strategic environment and cooperative behavior, and indicates that subjects in complementarity games reach full cooperation by agreeing on gradual moves toward it.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.