Testing for Racial Profiling in Traffic Stops From Behind a Veil of Darkness

Abstract

The key problem in testing for racial profiling in traffic stops is estimating the risk set, or "benchmark," against which to compare the race distribution of stopped drivers. To date, the two most common approaches have been to use residential population data or to conduct traffic surveys in which observers tally the race distribution of drivers at a certain location. It is widely recognized that residential population data provide poor estimates of the population at risk of a traffic stop; at the same time, traffic surveys have limitations and are more costly to carry out than the alternative that we propose herein. In this article we propose a test for racial profiling that does not require explicit, external estimates of the risk set. Rather, our approach makes use of what we call the "veil of darkness" hypothesis, which asserts that police are less likely to know the race of a motorist before making a stop after dark than they are during daylight. If we assume that racial differences in traffic patterns, driving behavior, and exposure to law enforcement do not vary between daylight and darkness, then we can test for racial profiling by comparing the race distribution of stops made during daylight to the race distribution of stops made after dark. We propose a means of weakening this assumption by restricting the sample to stops made during the evening hours and controlling for clock time while estimating daylight/darkness contrasts in the race distribution of stopped drivers. We provide conditions under which our estimates are robust to a substantial nonreporting problem present in our data and in many other studies of racial profiling. We propose an approach to assess the sensitivity of our results to departures from our maintained assumptions. Finally, we apply our method to data from Oakland, California and find that in this example the data yield little evidence of racial profiling in traffic stops.

A New Look at Racial Profiling: Evidence from the Boston Police Department

“…Our inability to estimate this fully specified model is not surprising since, even if c is a constant, there are only four possible cases of driver / officer interactions but five parameters. 12 If blacks and whites are not equally prejudiced, then our estimates will uncover the average level of prejudice across black and white officers. 13 In order to derive these relationships, consider the following four possible cases of driver/officer interactions for both the theoretical and empirical models: 1) j = w, r = w, 2) j = a, r = a,3) j = w, r = a,4) j = a, r = w. One can then show that β 0 + β 1 c = π(c, w) + t w w .…”

Explaining Race Gaps in Policing: Normative and Empirical Challenges

“…Studies in Portland and Cincinnati found no reduction in disparity at night, concluding that disparities were not caused by racial discrimination. 189 Studies in Minneapolis and Syracuse reached the opposite conclusion; the Syracuse study, unlike the others, accounted for variations in artificial light. 190 These studies are very clever.…”

A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis

“…This confirms that less information (no criminal background check) leads to resorting to race as a proxy of productivity. The impact of race-specific speech patterns, collected from recorded interviews, on the employer's understanding of speaker characteristics has also been evaluated by Grogger (2011) through OSL and median regressions. He found that speakers identified as black earned about 17% less than whites, after controlling for personal and ability characteristics.…”