Testing for <i>Within × Within</i> and <i>Between × Within</i> Moderation Using Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Models

Speyer, Lydia Gabriela; Ushakova, Anastasia; Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne; Murray, Aja Louise; Kievit, Rogier A.

doi:10.1080/10705511.2022.2096613

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Instead, by specifying random intercepts, the RI‐CLPM captures the trait‐like, individual differences and isolates the dynamic, within‐person effects (Mulder & Hamaker, 2021; Usami, 2021). For this reason, the cross‐lagged effects estimated by RI‐CLPM represent unbiased estimates of within‐person effects, while the covariances between the random intercepts represent the between‐person relationships (Hamaker et al., 2015; Speyer, Ushakova, Blakemore, Murray, & Kievit, 2023). We fitted the RI‐CLPM based on Hamaker et al.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Curiosity Causes Creativity? Revealing the Reinforcement Circle between State Curiosity and Creativity

Ma¹,

Wei²

2023

Journal of Creative Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Curiosity has long been extolled as a seed for employee creativity. This causality is plausible when considering curiosity as a stable trait. However, curiosity can also oscillate as a transitory state, thus complicating the causal sequence between such state curiosity and creativity. To clarify the causal ordering and achieve a refined understanding of what role state curiosity plays in the creative process, we utilize a random‐intercept cross‐lagged panel model (RI‐CLPM) to estimate the reciprocal effects between state curiosity and creativity at the within‐person level. With a full longitudinal panel data across three‐time points (N = 400), we find that at the within‐person level, state curiosity has a positive lagged effect on creativity and creativity also shows a positive lagged effect on state curiosity. This research highlights that curiosity and creativity, in fact, mutually reinforce each other.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…'s (2015) and Speyer et al. 's (2023) Mplus input code. A more detailed tutorial on this method is included in the Appendix S1.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Curiosity Causes Creativity? Revealing the Reinforcement Circle between State Curiosity and Creativity

Ma¹,

Wei²

2023

Journal of Creative Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition to the traditional approach using a median split, we examined health as a continuous moderator. Based on suggestions by Speyer et al (2023), we used the random intercept of health (RIH) as a time-invariant variable. Specifically, we examined a between (random intercept health) x within (within variables of sickness presence, job satisfaction, or health) interaction to test whether the general health status during the study period moderates the cross-lagged effects of sickness presence on job satisfaction or health and vice versa.…”

Section: General Health Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reciprocal Effects of Sickness Presence, Job Satisfaction, and Health: A Six-Wave Longitudinal Study

Dietz

Zacher

2023

Occup Health Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Numerous cross-sectional studies have examined associations of employees’ sickness presence (i.e., working while being ill) with job satisfaction and health. However, these studies conflate between- and within-person variance and do not allow disentangling the direction of effects among these constructs. Sickness presence may have positive or negative within-person effects on job satisfaction and health, and vice versa. Based on conservation of resources theory, the effort-recovery model, and the job demands-resources model, we test a set of competing hypotheses using a six-wave longitudinal study over 15 months with N = 363 employees. Results of random-intercept cross-lagged panel modeling showed that both sickness presence spells and frequency had negative within-person effects on job satisfaction, but did not predict health. In addition, job satisfaction had a negative within-person effect on sickness presence spells, and health had a negative within-person effect on sickness presence frequency. Overall, these findings contribute to the organizational literature by providing evidence for reciprocal and negative effects among sickness presence and job satisfaction, as well as a negative effect of health on sickness presence at the within-person level. Based on the findings, organizational practitioners could implement programs to enhance job satisfaction and health and to raise awareness about the potential negative consequences of sickness presence.

show abstract

“…Beyond the studies on the between-domain relations, the evidence on relations within the domains of internalising and externalising mental health symptoms is also inconclusive and scarce. In the internalising domain, for example, a study found no longitudinal associations between emotional symptoms (i.e., depressed affect) and peer problems within children [ 28 ], whereas other studies have shown a longitudinal link between peer problems and emotional symptoms [ 29 ]. Some other evidence points toward a reciprocal longitudinal relation only between specific time points [ 30 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic interplay of developing internalising and externalising mental health from early childhood to mid-adolescence: Teasing apart trait, state, and cross-cohort effects

Katsantonis

2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study examined the within-child, between-child, and between-cohort effects in the longitudinal relations between and within the internalising and externalising mental health symptoms’ domains. Leveraging the data of 5998 children (ages 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 years; 49% female) from the sequential Growing Up in Australia dual-cohort, multigroup longitudinal measurement invariance, and random-intercept cross-lagged panel models were deployed. Multigroup longitudinal measurement invariance revealed that the measurements of peer problems, emotional symptoms, and hyperactivity were strictly invariant, whereas conduct problems were partially strictly invariant across cohorts over time. The two cohorts did not display significant differences in the structural relations between internalising and externalising mental health symptoms, indicating the stability of the findings. In the internalising symptoms’ domain, moderate to strong reciprocal effects were found from middle childhood onwards. In the externalising symptoms’ domain, the results of reciprocal effects between conduct problems and hyperactivity were mainly not significant. Across domains, the reciprocal associations of emotional symptoms with hyperactivity and conduct problems were sporadic or non-existent. Peer problems were reciprocally associated with conduct problems and hyperactivity from middle childhood onwards. Overall, the findings clearly highlight the interdependence of developing internalising and externalising symptoms and reveal new insights about the early life-course development of internalising and externalising mental health symptoms.

show abstract

Testing for Within × Within and Between × Within Moderation Using Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Models

Cited by 10 publications

References 39 publications

Curiosity Causes Creativity? Revealing the Reinforcement Circle between State Curiosity and Creativity

Curiosity Causes Creativity? Revealing the Reinforcement Circle between State Curiosity and Creativity

Reciprocal Effects of Sickness Presence, Job Satisfaction, and Health: A Six-Wave Longitudinal Study

Dynamic interplay of developing internalising and externalising mental health from early childhood to mid-adolescence: Teasing apart trait, state, and cross-cohort effects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About