2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9957.00275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing For Government Intertemporal Solvency: A Smooth Transition Error Correction Model Approach

Abstract: Applied macroeconomists have tested for the government intertemporal solvency condition by either testing for linear stationarity in the total government de¢cit series or testing for linear cointegration between total government spending and total tax revenues. A number of authors have focused, in particular, on structural breaks in the government de¢cit process. In this paper, we use a smooth transition error correction model to test and estimate a shift in the adjustment toward a linear cointegration relatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They find that the introduction of the Maastricht Treaty in 1991 has caused a structural break towards sustainability; and that fiscal policy at the eve of the euro's introduction in 1999 was strong‐form sustainable in Ireland and weak‐form sustainable in the rest of their sample countries. Finally, they find evidence of non‐linear fiscal adjustment, which is consistent with the findings of Bohn (1998), Cipollini (2001), Sarno (2001), Arestis et al . (2004), Bajo‐Rubio et al .…”
Section: Previous Literaturesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…They find that the introduction of the Maastricht Treaty in 1991 has caused a structural break towards sustainability; and that fiscal policy at the eve of the euro's introduction in 1999 was strong‐form sustainable in Ireland and weak‐form sustainable in the rest of their sample countries. Finally, they find evidence of non‐linear fiscal adjustment, which is consistent with the findings of Bohn (1998), Cipollini (2001), Sarno (2001), Arestis et al . (2004), Bajo‐Rubio et al .…”
Section: Previous Literaturesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…All variables have been expressed as a percentage of GDP and converted into their natural logarithmic form. We use revenue and expenditure ratios to GDP since government authorities are mainly concerned with the dynamics of the different budget items relative to the overall size of the economy (see Hakkio & Rush, 1991;Cipollini, 2001). The cointegrating relationship between the two variables is also shown in Figure 1c.…”
Section: Data Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-and-a-half-year reaction delay (i.e. d = 6) combined with a relatively smooth switch from one regime to the other γ =10, can be explained in terms of the political-institutional processes (see Cipollini, 2001). Fiscal laws and regulations are drafted, through a budget document, and tabled to parliament for approval before implementation, a process that could be time consuming.…”
Section: Lstecm Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies point to the presence of nonlinearities in fiscal policy in the United States (Sarno, 2001) and the United Kingdom (Cipollini, 2001). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%