Testing for dual impacts of contaminants and parasites on hosts: the importance of skew

Abstract

A review of recent studies published over a 23-year timespan (1990–2012) showed rapidly increasing interest in exploring how environmental contaminants and parasitism might influence each other and (or) interact to affect host health. Those experimental and observational studies fall into three broad categories (comparative studies of the possible influence of each factor on the other, correlative studies between contaminants and parasitism, and studies on relative bioaccumulation of contaminants by parasites versus their hosts). Despite the exponential increase in relevant studies, little attention has been paid to how contaminants and parasitism should co-occur among individuals within host populations and (or) how the nature of co-distributions should be incorporated into study designs and analyses. Null expectations of co-distributions between contaminants and parasitism can be derived from underlying distributions of each factor. Using a subset of studies, we found contaminant distributions showed positive skew in about one third of cases testing for correlations between contaminant concentrations and parasitism among hosts. We show such skew is expected for theoretical reasons. We used this information to guide simulations wherein the oft-cited negative binomial distribution of parasitism (also supported by theory) was combined with both log-normal (skewed) and normal distributions of contaminants to generate expected null co-distributions. Simulations demonstrated an increasingly concave (or L-shaped) co-distribution with increasing contaminant positive skew: proportionately more individuals experience low levels of each factor while few to none experienced high contaminant and high parasite burdens simultaneously. Our results have the following implications: they call into question experimental studies exposing specimens to parasites and pollutants at levels higher than, or even equal to, observed averages, and they provide a framework for exploring how individual-based effects might scale up into effects at the population level. Potential improvements to study designs and (or) statistical tests are offered that recognize the need to understand the underlying distributions of both contaminants and parasitism and the degree to which one can infer host population effects.

Anti-parasite treatment results in decreased estimated survival with increasing lead (Pb) levels in the common eiderSomateria mollissima

“…Natural populations are exposed to different environmental stressors, and interest in how these stressors interact has increased recently [1,2]. In particular, research has accelerated rapidly into the combined impacts of environmental contaminants and parasitism on host health, reproduction and/or survival and whether impacts are additive, synergistic or compensatory, and how susceptibility to one factor influences susceptibility to the other [3][4][5].…”

PCBs in fish and their cestode parasites in Lake Victoria

“…Fish parasites have also previously been used in monitoring inorganic pollution (e.g. see (Sures 2001;Huang et al 2015;Sures et al 1999), but research on the accumulation of organic compounds, including PCBs (e.g., Brázová et al 2012a), is scant in parasitic organisms ( Sures 2004( Sures , 2008Marcogliese and Pietrock 2011;Le et al 2014;Morrill et al 2014). To this purpose, the aim of this study was to assess the levels of PCBs in sediments and commercial fish species and also evaluate the potential of fish parasites as bioindicator of PCBs in Lake Victoria, Kenya.…”

Differential micropollutants bioaccumulation in European hake and their parasites Anisakis sp.

“…Cumulated effects of co-occurring parasites and pollutants can be either antagonists (contaminant affects parasites and limits infestation) or synergistics (contaminant affects hosts immune system and enhance infestation), precluding from easy understanding and prediction (Morrill et al, 2014).…”