2022
DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for COVID-19 is Much More Effective When Performed Immediately Prior to Social Mixing

Abstract: Objective: To quantify the utility of RT-PCR and rapid antigen tests in preventing post-arrival transmission based on timing of the pre-departure test.Methods: We derived analytical expressions to compute post-arrival transmission when no test is performed, and when either an RT-PCR or any of 18 rapid antigen tests is performed at specified times before arrival. We determined the diagnostic sensitivity of the rapid antigen tests by propagating their RT-PCR percent positive agreement onto known RT-PCR diagnosti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Postarrival SARS-CoV-2 test results were 52% less likely to be positive when the predeparture COVID-19 testing requirement was in effect than during the 12-week period after it was discontinued; this finding was true even when controlling for other factors such as incidence in the flight’s country of origin and pool size. These findings, based on observed, real-world traveler data, support the value of predeparture testing as a tool for reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission associated with travel and were consistent with estimates from previous modeling studies ( 4 7 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Postarrival SARS-CoV-2 test results were 52% less likely to be positive when the predeparture COVID-19 testing requirement was in effect than during the 12-week period after it was discontinued; this finding was true even when controlling for other factors such as incidence in the flight’s country of origin and pool size. These findings, based on observed, real-world traveler data, support the value of predeparture testing as a tool for reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission associated with travel and were consistent with estimates from previous modeling studies ( 4 7 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As of June 12, 2022, predeparture testing was no longer mandatory but remained recommended by CDC ( 2 , 3 ). Various modeling studies have estimated that predeparture testing the day before or the day of air travel reduces transmission or importation of SARS-CoV-2 by 31%–76% ( 4 7 ). Postarrival SARS-CoV-2 pooled testing data from CDC’s Traveler-based Genomic Surveillance program were used to compare SARS-CoV-2 test results among volunteer travelers arriving at four U.S. airports during two 12-week periods: March 20–June 11, 2022, when predeparture testing was required, and June 12–September 3, 2022, when predeparture testing was not required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that, during a growing epidemic, only 2.8%, 9.7%, 40.2% and 59.8% of transmission potential is expected to be detectable by traveler screening via molecular test for SARS-CoV-1, Ebola, SARS-CoV-2, and influenza A, respectively. Our estimate for SARS-CoV-2 is comparable to other modeling studies that found testing reduced post-arrival transmission risk by 29-53% [20,21].…”
Section: Fundamental Limit Of Traveler Screeningsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…More broadly, our work is situated within a family of research that uses mathematical modeling to evaluate different testing scenarios. Other areas that our modeling framework could easily extend to include pre-event testing [20,42], screening in combination with other interventions such as quarantine and/or contact tracing [3,18,19,21], and combining multiple screening methods such as fever screening and health questionnaires with molecular testing [1,4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation