1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1987.tb01762.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for Contact Allergy in Experimental Animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar (non-linear dose-response) phenomenon is well-described for contact sensitization to many other reactive chemicals, e.g. formaldehyde, picryl chloride, DNCB [47]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A similar (non-linear dose-response) phenomenon is well-described for contact sensitization to many other reactive chemicals, e.g. formaldehyde, picryl chloride, DNCB [47]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Sensitization methods involving Freund's com plete adjuvant (FCA) injections generally yield the best results for nickel and chromium [2,[4][5][6], whereas repeated open epicutaneous (e.c.) sensitization ap parently is more effective in mercury ACD [5,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has pfeviously been applied to other dental materials, e.g., endodontie sealers (21), denture base rnaterials (22), and resin-based filling materials (23). Ideally, in the guinea pig maximization test, the animals are exposed to well-deftned chemical compounds (24). However, previous experietice with guitiea pigs with endodotitic sealers based on zinc oxide-eugenol, colophony, or epoxy resitis (21) has itidicated that aqueous extracts of the materials are capable of sensitizing by this method, and that the sensitization rate correlates with the known sensitizing potential of some of the ingredients of the material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%