2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Einstein's equivalence principle with short gamma-ray bursts: Table 1.

Abstract: Einstein's equivalence principle (EEP) can be tested by the time delay between photons with different energies passing through a gravitational field. As one of the most energetic explosions in the Universe, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) provide an effective tool to test the accuracy of EEP. In this paper, we use the continuous spectra of 20 short GRBs detected by the Swift/BAT to test the validity of EEP. Taking the duration of GRBs as the upper limit of the time delay induced by EEP violation (assuming that the hig… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it implicitly assumes that the trajectory is short enough that one can treat the region of spacetime containing it as Minkowski plus a linear perturbation, to a good approximation. We will see that this assumption is well justified for sources like GW170817, but not for sources with redshifts z > ∼ 1, like, for instance, the gamma-ray bursts at z = 1.5, z = 2.2, z = 2.6, or even z = 11.97 considered in [14], [23], [19], and [25], respectively. While Nusser [10] gives a formulation of the constraint that is applicable to more distant sources, the previously cited papers use the standard formulation in Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Additionally, it implicitly assumes that the trajectory is short enough that one can treat the region of spacetime containing it as Minkowski plus a linear perturbation, to a good approximation. We will see that this assumption is well justified for sources like GW170817, but not for sources with redshifts z > ∼ 1, like, for instance, the gamma-ray bursts at z = 1.5, z = 2.2, z = 2.6, or even z = 11.97 considered in [14], [23], [19], and [25], respectively. While Nusser [10] gives a formulation of the constraint that is applicable to more distant sources, the previously cited papers use the standard formulation in Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The majority of previous attempts to constrain violations of the WEP via ∆γ ij with GRBs [18,[51][52][53][54], FRBs [6,[55][56][57][58], Supernovae [59,60], Gravitational Waves [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69], Blazar Flares [70][71][72][73][74] or Pulsars [75][76][77][78] have assumed that the gravitational potential is dominated by the contribution from the Milky Way and/or other massive objects such as the Laniakea supercluster. This has two major shortcomings for distant sources: firstly the gravitational potential in Equation 2 should be a fluctuation about the cosmological mean (and thus can take either sign, unlike in the multiple-source approximation where it is strictly additive), and secondly the long range behaviour of the gravitational potential means that we cannot neglect the large-scale distribution of mass [8,9].…”
Section: B Comparison With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…photons and neutrinos) or two (same) particles with different energies into account (therefore with different γ 1 and γ 2 ), it is possible to constrain EEP since the theories of gravity that are built in agreement with it predict γ 1 = γ 2 . The accuracy of the EEP has been tested through the difference of the γ values, ∆γ ≡ γ 1 − γ 2 , using several astronomical sources: supernova 1987A [11,12], gammaray bursts (GRBs) [10,[13][14][15][16], fast radio bursts (FRBs) [15,[17][18][19], the Crab pulsar [20][21][22], blazars [23,24] and gravitational wave (GW) sources [25][26][27][28]. Very recently, the association of GW and GRB observations was used to provide a new constraint on the ∆γ through the time delay between the gravitational and electromagnetic radiation produced by a binary neutron star merger [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%