2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing dispersal and cryptic diversity in a widely distributed groundwater amphipod (Niphargus rhenorhodanensis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
138
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
138
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study thus provides an example of how molecular tools can contribute to the delimitation of species with extensive convergent morphologies, which in turn could have important conservation implications. Molecular tools, such as DNA sequencing, will undoubtedly continue to be of importance for resolving cryptic species complexes that are pervasive in cave environments (Lefébure et al, 2007;Trontelj et al, 2009;Neiber et al, 2012). Similarly, morphological differences between lifestages within a species are commonplace among crustaceans, and in many instances pose important challenges for organism identification and taxonomic classification.…”
Section: International Journal Of Speleology 45 (2) 149-170 Tampamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study thus provides an example of how molecular tools can contribute to the delimitation of species with extensive convergent morphologies, which in turn could have important conservation implications. Molecular tools, such as DNA sequencing, will undoubtedly continue to be of importance for resolving cryptic species complexes that are pervasive in cave environments (Lefébure et al, 2007;Trontelj et al, 2009;Neiber et al, 2012). Similarly, morphological differences between lifestages within a species are commonplace among crustaceans, and in many instances pose important challenges for organism identification and taxonomic classification.…”
Section: International Journal Of Speleology 45 (2) 149-170 Tampamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, species are considered cryptic if they have been erroneously classified as a single species because of a lack of distinct morphological features. DNA barcoding has revealed cryptic diversity in a variety of taxa (Nieberding et al, 2005;Bickford et al, 2006;Witt et al, 2006;Lefébure et al, 2007;Pauls et al, 2010). Lefébure et al (2006b) showed that clades of crustaceans diverging by more than 0.16 substitutions per site of the CO I gene as measured by patristic distances are likely to present distinct species.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity and Cryptic Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors (e.g., Bickford, 2006) have suggested a link between extreme environmental conditions and cryptic species. Extreme environments impose stabilizing selection on changes in morphology during speciation, resulting in morphological stasis (Rothschild and Mancinelli, 2001;Nevo, 2001;Lefébure et al, 2006a;Bickford, 2006;Lefébure et al, 2007). C. alpina is in general restricted to extreme habitat conditions of cold springs and crenal streams.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity and Cryptic Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, genetic analysis of the Niphargus genus revealed many cryptic species (Trontelj et al 2009). Most of these species have narrow local ranges, but about 25% of them have been found in caves 100 km or more apart (Lefébure et al 2006, Lefébure et al 2007, Trontelj et al 2009). The latter is peculiar to N. arbiter Karaman G., 1984, N. fontanus Bate, 1859, N. illidzensis cf.…”
Section: Factors Determining the Structure Of Troglobiont Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%